Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
You want people to believe that the behavior of an antireflective coating is, first light reflects from it, and then it's cancelled - before anybody see's it. That's trying to have it both ways. No, that is obviously what happens, Jim. Since it happens at the speed of light, our eyes just cannot see it. But for the instant of time it takes the light wave to travel the 1/2WL round trip through the thin-film and back, there exists a reflection from the thin-film. The laws of physics will not allow anything else. It's a lot easier to detect at RF frequencies where 1/4WL takes some time for the RF wave to travel. For instance, 1/4WL at 4 MHz is 61.5 feet. It takes RF a measurable length of time to travel that distance and for that length of time during the transient state, a reflection exists which is canceled if a Z0-match is achieved. That's just simple physics. Here is an example: XMTR---50 ohm T-line---+---1/4WL 291.4 ohm T-line---50 ohm load Rho at the impedance discontinuity is 0.707. For the length of time it takes the first reflection to arrive back from the load at point '+', 1/2 of the forward power is reflected back toward the source. That's a reflected wave that is subsequently canceled. Exactly what causes the cancellation of that reflected wave? You have *never* answered that question. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Is the Superposition Principle invalid? | Antenna |