| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tony Giacometti wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote: Tony Giacometti wrote: it is a shielded loop and no the gap is there, thats why I am wondering why its not doing what I thought it would do. Roy, I don't fully understand why you made this response to me. You mentionI built a truly shielded loop. How so? I did exactly what the directions called for including having a gap. My apology. I too-quickly and incorrectly read your "and no the gap is there" as "no gap is there". My statement about your creating a truly shielded loop was wrong. The loop with the gap should work as intended. If these loops are a folk tale, other than using a beverage which I don't have the room for, how am I going to reduce the noise enough to be able to woprk 160 and 75 meters effectively? "Shielded" loops aren't a folk tale, they work fine. They have a broad pattern with, if constructed properly, narrow and deep nulls. It's a mistaken idea about how they work that's the folk tale. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Low Noise Receiving antennas | Antenna | |||
| Receiving Loop | Antenna | |||
| Receiving loop antenna design | Antenna | |||
| Random Legth Receiving Only Ant.; Close Into A Loop ? | Antenna | |||
| Technical question for receiving TV signals by a loop Antenna | Antenna | |||