Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony Giacometti wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote: Tony Giacometti wrote: it is a shielded loop and no the gap is there, thats why I am wondering why its not doing what I thought it would do. Roy, I don't fully understand why you made this response to me. You mentionI built a truly shielded loop. How so? I did exactly what the directions called for including having a gap. My apology. I too-quickly and incorrectly read your "and no the gap is there" as "no gap is there". My statement about your creating a truly shielded loop was wrong. The loop with the gap should work as intended. If these loops are a folk tale, other than using a beverage which I don't have the room for, how am I going to reduce the noise enough to be able to woprk 160 and 75 meters effectively? "Shielded" loops aren't a folk tale, they work fine. They have a broad pattern with, if constructed properly, narrow and deep nulls. It's a mistaken idea about how they work that's the folk tale. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Low Noise Receiving antennas | Antenna | |||
Receiving Loop | Antenna | |||
Receiving loop antenna design | Antenna | |||
Random Legth Receiving Only Ant.; Close Into A Loop ? | Antenna | |||
Technical question for receiving TV signals by a loop Antenna | Antenna |