Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony Giacometti wrote in
news:sO2dnUZbkeShCaLanZ2dnUVZ_v2pnZ2d@hawaiiantel. net: Owen Duffy wrote: Owen Duffy wrote in : .... It is questionable whether the parallel tuned circuit is an efficient coupling method for a low Z receiver. I am able to get a noise peak tuning the capacitor and the preamps I use are supposed to be a match from approx 25 ohms to about 125 ohms. Tony, I have written a program to solve for transmission loss from the source being the emf induced into the electrically small loop through to the 50 ohm receiver load on the output. The program models the transmission line stub on one side of the loop gap, and the transmission line on the other side to the tuning capacitor and 50 ohm load. I need to do some more checking, but the program results support my proposition that parallel "tuning" is not an efficient coupling. The only way to ensure a near 50 ohm receiver for test purposes is to put a 10dB 50ohm attenuator in front of it. If you are able to do such, does the receiver noise peak with the loop tuning capacitor at minimum C? Owen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Low Noise Receiving antennas | Antenna | |||
Receiving Loop | Antenna | |||
Receiving loop antenna design | Antenna | |||
Random Legth Receiving Only Ant.; Close Into A Loop ? | Antenna | |||
Technical question for receiving TV signals by a loop Antenna | Antenna |