| Home | 
| Search | 
| Today's Posts | 
| 
		 
			 
			#22  
			
			
			 
		
	   
			
			
		 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			"Tdonaly"  wrote in message 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	... Steve's info will get you a beginners understanding of circuit theory That WAS the intent. which is based on a low-frequency, quasi-static simplification of electromagnetic theory. Yikes! Call it what you like. Unfortunately, anything that has any appreciable length, such as a transmission line or an antenna... wave mechanics to get any real idea of what is happening in these situations. I guess you can call it "wave mechanics" if you like, but it IS true that what happens on a transmission line is waves and this is quite different from simple circuit theory. First you need the circuit theory, though. That isn't the end of it, though, since in order to understand what is happening when an object radiates, you have to understand Maxwell's equations....vector calculus. This I'll disagree with. It's been so long since I studied Maxwell's equations, I can't even spell his name, but I can give a workable explanatin of radiation that the beginner can understand and won't cause trouble for any ham's purposes. Will it violate old Maxwell? I don't know and don't care for my purposes and 90% of the people interested. That isn't the end, either, but it's as close as any *normal* human wants to go. Whew! sure glad I'm *abnormal*. Whenever someone who was taught circuit theory tries to apply its vocabulary and concepts to explain all electromagnetic phenomena, that someone is going to run into trouble and come up with a multitude of idiocies for which which he'll find no end of people ready to criticize him. Whoa... Sure glad I'm not trying to do THAT! This is the problem: Cecil and Yuri want to explain the current taper through a long solenoidal coil using the vocabulary and concepts of circuit theory rather than the difficult but more precise language of electromagnetic theory. Sure glad I don't care and that I didn't tack my post onto theirs thus indicating that I was trying to enter that discussion. 73 Steve-- Steve N, K,9;d, c. i My email has no u's.  | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		 | 
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
| Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
| Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna | |||
| 50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||