LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #22   Report Post  
Old February 20th 04, 08:36 PM
Steve Nosko
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tdonaly" wrote in message
...
Steve's info will get you a beginners understanding of circuit
theory


That WAS the intent.


which is based on a low-frequency, quasi-static simplification
of electromagnetic theory.


Yikes! Call it what you like.

Unfortunately, anything that has any
appreciable length, such as a transmission line or an antenna...
wave mechanics to get any real idea of what is happening
in these situations.


I guess you can call it "wave mechanics" if you like, but it IS true
that what happens on a transmission line is waves and this is quite
different from simple circuit theory. First you need the circuit theory,
though.


That isn't the end of it, though, since in order
to understand what is happening when an object radiates, you
have to understand Maxwell's equations....vector calculus.


This I'll disagree with. It's been so long since I studied
Maxwell's equations, I can't even spell his name, but I can give a workable
explanatin of radiation that the beginner can understand and won't cause
trouble for any ham's purposes. Will it violate old Maxwell? I don't know
and don't care for my purposes and 90% of the people interested.


That isn't the
end, either, but it's as close as any *normal* human wants to go.


Whew! sure glad I'm *abnormal*.


Whenever someone who was taught circuit theory tries to
apply its vocabulary and concepts to explain all electromagnetic
phenomena, that someone is going to run into trouble and
come up with a multitude of idiocies for which which he'll find no end of
people ready to criticize him.


Whoa... Sure glad I'm not trying to do THAT!


This is the problem: Cecil and Yuri want to explain the current taper
through a long solenoidal coil using the vocabulary and concepts of
circuit theory rather than the difficult but more precise
language of electromagnetic theory.


Sure glad I don't care and that I didn't tack my post onto theirs
thus indicating that I was trying to enter that discussion.


73 Steve--
Steve N, K,9;d, c. i My email has no u's.





 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mobile Ant L match ? Henry Kolesnik Antenna 14 January 20th 04 05:08 AM
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 11:06 PM
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit Dr. Slick Antenna 126 September 10th 03 05:26 PM
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? Dr. Slick Antenna 140 August 18th 03 09:17 PM
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 30th 03 12:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017