Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil, W5DXP wrote:
"If the transmitter is linear (like the antenna is linear), i.e. Class-A, 1/2 or more of the generated power weill be lost in the source." True, that would be an equalizer between reception and transmitting system efficiencies of antennas, but Class A isn`t the only way to get linear amplification, Hi-Fi nuts to the contrary not withstanding. Class B is often used to combine efficiency with high undistorted output capability. Class B amplifiers are biased to cut-off so they draw no current when there is no signal input. A class B amplifier may have 60% efficiency at full power output, for example. Such an amplifier will have only about 30% efficiency at 1/2 of its maximum power output. Turman writes on page 354 of his 1955 edition: "With the largest signal that the (Class-B) amplifier can be expected to handle satisfactorily, Emin/Eb will be small, and the actual efficiency at full power is commonly of the order of 60%." The receiving antenna can never be more than 50% efficient due to re-radiation which I don`t seem to be able to explain. Sorry. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |