I'll never go there in the RF arena even though another hobby of mine is
laser light shows.
Placing "photon" and "RF" in the same paragraph is ... what shall I call it,
flame-fodder?



"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:46:42 -0600, "Steve Nosko"
wrote:
I think the phrase "available energy" may draw discussion, but won't
start
it.
Uh-Oh
I suspect it is not the thing to focus on. However...
This has in the past lead to a cataract of 600 posting threads

With a "conjugate match" the source dissipates 50% of the power and the
load
the other 50%. This can't be changed.
This is the 1mm fuse that starts that torrent. Once lit, no one
escapes.
...
Snake oil? The math is correct, but there may be some practical limit
not
considered.

Hi Steve,

Practical or otherwise will be dismissed to the discussion of photons
and general relativity by the end of two days, if this doesn't fall
flat on its face with mine being the only comment. ;-)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC