![]() |
Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna
Roy Lewallen wrote:
This isn't quite correct. A standing wave isn't the sum of traveling waves. It's a description of the envelope of the current distribution that sum produces. . . Look at this standing wave: http://www.chemmybear.com/standing.html The equation for that standing wave is: Ex = E*e^j(wt-Bz) + E'*e^j(wt+Bz) [see quote below] At one time in the cycle, the standing wave equals zero all up and down the line. A STANDING WAVE *IS* THE SUM OF TRAVELING WAVES. On page 285 of "Fields and Waves in Modern Radio", 2nd edition, by Ramo and Whinnery, it gives the equations for the forward wave, the reflected wave, and the standing wave. Begin quote: -------------------------------------------------- Incident Wave --- E*e^j(wt-Bz) Reflected Wave --- -E*e^j(wt+Bz) If Ex = 0 at z = 0 for all values of time, E' = -E. [Standing Wave equation] Ex = E*e^j(wt-Bz) + E'*e^j(wt+Bz) = -2jE*sin(Bz e^jwt) [Standing wave envelope equation on page 42] V = -2jV1*sin(Bz) End quote: -------------------------------------------------- The standing wave equation is simply the sum of the traveling wave equations. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna
"Keith Dysart" wrote in message ... text cut..... The directional ammeter measures instantaneous Vt and It, does the above arithmetic and presents If. A directional ammeter that presents a single number rather than the time varying If has probably converted the instantaneous values to RMS. text cut...... ...Keith I don't think that the directional ammeter reads instantaneous Vt and It. The circuits I am thinking of sample a length of line (NOT A POINT) so the sample records average voltage (or current) from a period of time. If I understand the methodology of the directional ammeter correctly, it extracts energy from the wave from both magnetic (current) and voltage components. If the components are in phase, they add, and that only occurs with the wave going in the design direction. Yes, this is a reading of power, not voltage or current individually. Current and voltage are related by the Zo of the transmission line, so if we know current, we also know voltage, and visa versa. Agreed? 73, Roger, W7WKB |
Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna
On Dec 10, 10:08 am, "Roger Sparks" wrote:
"Keith Dysart" wrote in message ... text cut..... The directional ammeter measures instantaneous Vt and It, does the above arithmetic and presents If. A directional ammeter that presents a single number rather than the time varying If has probably converted the instantaneous values to RMS. text cut...... ...Keith I don't think that the directional ammeter reads instantaneous Vt and It. The circuits I am thinking of sample a length of line (NOT A POINT) so the sample records average voltage (or current) from a period of time. If I understand the methodology of the directional ammeter correctly, it extracts energy from the wave from both magnetic (current) and voltage components. If the components are in phase, they add, and that only occurs with the wave going in the design direction. Yes, this is a reading of power, not voltage or current individually. Current and voltage are related by the Zo of the transmission line, so if we know current, we also know voltage, and visa versa. Agreed? Only partly. If you look at the element on an instrument like a Bird 43, you will find that it is both capacitively and inductively coupled to the line. The capactive coupling is sensitive to the total voltage on the line at the point of the element, while the inductive coupling is sensitive to the total current in the line. The subtraction (or addition) is done in the element where the voltage sample and the current sample (scaled by Z0) are subtracted before being applied to the diode. The output of the diode is the rectified instantaneous difference of the voltage and scaled current from the equations originally provided. This is fed to an average responding meter which has a scale marked to show (Vf**2)/Z0 (i.e. power). You are correct that the element does not sample at a point, but rather over the width of the coupling element. This is done because of design limitations and is one of the sources for error in the instrument, though small if the wavelength is long compared to the element. There are many ways to obtain the instaneous voltage and current for the subtraction (or addition). Some designs measure the voltage by using an electrical connection to the line, so these are essentially measuring at a point. Other designs measure the current by detecting the voltage drop across a resistor in series with the line. Diagrams of the internals of the Bird 43 element are available in the Operations Manual he http://www.bird-electronic.com/produ...uct.aspx?id=81 ....Keith |
Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna
Keith Dysart wrote:
There are many ways to obtain the instaneous voltage and current for the subtraction (or addition). Here are the associated equations: Vz = V*e^-jBz + V'*e^+jBz Iz*Z0 = V*e^-jBz - V'*e^+jBz Current is sampled in such a way as to perform the multiplication by Z0. That's where the calibration to Z0 comes in. If one adds the two equations (samples) the reflected terms drop out and the result is a voltage proportional to the forward wave. If one subtracts the two equations (samples) the forward terms drop out and the result is a voltage proportional to the reflected wave. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna
Cecil Moore wrote:
If one adds the two equations (samples) the reflected terms drop out and the result is a voltage proportional to the forward wave. If one subtracts the two equations (samples) the forward terms drop out and the result is a voltage proportional to the reflected wave. Continuing: The phase of the standing-wave current in a 1/4WL stub is constant from feedpoint to tip. However, two directional couplers, one placed at the 1/3 point and the other placed at the 2/3 point would allow one to see the 30 degree phase shift in the traveling-waves at the points before diode rectification takes place. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna
Keith Dysart wrote:
Only partly. If you look at the element on an instrument like a Bird 43, you will find that it is both capacitively and inductively coupled to the line. The capactive coupling is sensitive to the total voltage on the line at the point of the element, while the inductive coupling is sensitive to the total current in the line. The subtraction (or addition) is done in the element where the voltage sample and the current sample (scaled by Z0) are subtracted before being applied to the diode. The output of the diode is the rectified instantaneous difference of the voltage and scaled current from the equations originally provided. This is fed to an average responding meter which has a scale marked to show (Vf**2)/Z0 (i.e. power). . . . Another common directional wattmeter circuit is the Bruene type circuit. This uses an ordinary current transformer to get the current sample and a direct connection for the voltage sample. The voltage sample is reduced to the correct proportional value via a transformer or capacitive voltage divider. It shouldn't be hard to find a diagram of one on the web. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna
Roy Lewallen wrote in news:13lr7u2mueltrb3
@corp.supernews.com: .... Another common directional wattmeter circuit is the Bruene type circuit. This uses an ordinary current transformer to get the current sample and a direct connection for the voltage sample. The voltage sample is reduced to the correct proportional value via a transformer or capacitive voltage divider. It shouldn't be hard to find a diagram of one on the web. The article at http://www.vk1od.net/VSWR/VSWRMeter.htm includes a simple circuit analysis of the Breune design and some comment on the application of the instrument. Owen |
Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna
"Roger Sparks" wrote in
: "Keith Dysart" wrote in message . .. text cut..... The directional ammeter measures instantaneous Vt and It, does the above arithmetic and presents If. A directional ammeter that presents a single number rather than the time varying If has probably converted the instantaneous values to RMS. text cut...... ...Keith I don't think that the directional ammeter reads instantaneous Vt and It. The circuits I am thinking of sample a length of line (NOT A POINT) so the sample records average voltage (or current) from a period of time. Many simple reflectometer designs do indeed sample the line over a short length of line, and that short length may be 100mm or more. Ideally, they would take the sample at a point. (Since a point has zero length, I can't quickly think of a sampling technique that truly takes a point sample.) Although sampling over a non-zero length limits their accuracy somewhat, if that length is kept sufficiently short, they are still able to provide sufficiently accurate measurements. Owen |
Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna
Owen Duffy wrote:
"Roger Sparks" wrote in : "Keith Dysart" wrote in message . .. text cut..... The directional ammeter measures instantaneous Vt and It, does the above arithmetic and presents If. A directional ammeter that presents a single number rather than the time varying If has probably converted the instantaneous values to RMS. text cut...... ...Keith I don't think that the directional ammeter reads instantaneous Vt and It. The circuits I am thinking of sample a length of line (NOT A POINT) so the sample records average voltage (or current) from a period of time. Many simple reflectometer designs do indeed sample the line over a short length of line, and that short length may be 100mm or more. Ideally, they would take the sample at a point. (Since a point has zero length, I can't quickly think of a sampling technique that truly takes a point sample.) The voltage sample is easy... measure the voltage using an infinitely thin probe. The current sample is measured in a similar way by measuring the magnetic field over a infinitely small segment of the conductor. There are sensitivity issues or bandwidth issues, but there are lots of very, very small magnetic field probe schemes around. If one says, "point sample" == "less than 1/1000 wavelength), I think it's actually pretty straight forward, certainly for 100 MHz or less. (3mm is 1/1000 lambda). Although sampling over a non-zero length limits their accuracy somewhat, if that length is kept sufficiently short, they are still able to provide sufficiently accurate measurements. Owen |
Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna
Cecil Moore wrote: Gene Fuller wrote: So how many nanoseconds does that 36.6 degree phase shift represent? As far as impedance discontinuity *points* go, a nonsense question. The question was excellent. 'Impedance discontinuity points' is nonsense. How many nanoseconds does it take for a signal to travel through a dimensionless point???? Well, let's see. What is the speed of light multiplied by zero? Hmmmm, that's a really tough one. The hard part would be inverting zero sec^-1 in order to get units of time. :-) 73, ac6xg |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com