Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Donaly wrote:
People who want to know what W8JI actually believes, as opposed to what Cecil says he believes, should go to W8JI's website. I agree, Tom, and here is the URL: http://www.w8ji.com/inductor_current_time_delay.htm W8JI takes a 2" dia, 100 turn, 10 inch long coil, and claims the actual delay through that coil is 3 nS or 4.5 degrees. (The formula for the velocity factor of such a coil yields ~0.033 at 4 MHz making the actual delay ~37 degrees or ~25 nS at 4 MHz.) W8JI's mistake was using standing wave current to try to measure that delay. The phase of standing wave current changes hardly at all and is useless for measuring delay. If the delay is to be measured by observing phase shifts, then traveling wave current should be used. That would require loading the coil with a resistor equal to its characteristic impedance. Another way to measure the delay is to set the coil up as a helical antenna over a ground plane and find the self-resonant frequency which would mean the phase shift through the coil is 90 degrees at that self-resonant frequency. Even though the delay changes with frequency, it is highly unlikely to drop from 90 degrees to 4.5 degrees in a few MHz. ... your little theory about phase shifts across loading coils, which you can't substantiate through experiment, or even through any type of rigorous theory, is nothing more than an exercise in philosophical fantasy. Actually, it is an exercise in the physics of reality. A 3nS delay through a 100 uH coil is the real "exercise in philosophical fantasy" and obviously impossible. Try it with a TDR and see what you get. Heck, try it at DC and see what you get. At his request, I sent a test setup schematic to one of the gurus on this newsgroup so he could prove me wrong. He has gone silent and stopped answering my emails. I expect to see a paper or magazine article announcing "his discovery". -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|