Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Tom Donaly wrote: Many people over the years have done just fine loading their antennas with lumped inductors. That's not the point of this discussion, Tom. The only question that needs to be answered here is: Can a 2" dia, 100 T, 10" long loading coil have a delay of 3 nS through it at 4 MHz? Do you support such a technical absurdity? The Corum IEEE white paper suggests that delay is in error by a magnitude. All of the boundary test conditions given in Corum's IEEE white paper are satisfied by a 75m bugcatcher loading coil. There is no reason to believe that the underlying principles of physics do not apply. In fact, the diagram of the 1/4WL resonant system looks exactly like a base loading coil, stinger, and top hat as is used for 75m mobile operation. Do you really believe that an antenna + loading coil has to be a quarter wave long to resonate? 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|