Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"AI4QJ" wrote in
: "Owen Duffy" wrote in message ... .... That didn't come out very clearly. As I understand it, Cecil argues that there is substantial phase change in the forward and reflected wave components when considering the helix as a transmission line. I don't know if this is too simplistic but here goes: The forward wave maintains it's phase as it encounters a new purely resitive medium (like a straight copper wire or PCB trace). The reflected wave that goes back into the helix transmission line refects as a mirror image of the forward wave, just as light would reflect from a partial mirror. This indeed would be a phase change relative to the incident wave, approx. 90 degrees TIME or about 62.5 nsec at 4MHz in the example under consideration. From here we can go on to discuss the amplitude of the reflected wave and what it takes to cause resonance and a 1:1 standing wave to appear. The standing wave will not have a time phase shift so it cannot be used to measure delay, but voltage and current will of course have a 90 degrees distance phase shift across the transmission line. I am open to correction on this. The seems to me a bit confused, and I can't really understand it. Looking at the coil Tom used: If you use the inductance calculator at http://hamwaves.com/antennas/inductance.html to determine Beta, you get 2.008 rad/m. The coil is .254m long, so that suggests a one-way phase delay of 0.51 rad, or 29.2°. Some suggest that this coil will replace the equivalent electrical length in a quarter wave monopole to shorten it with inductive loading, and irrespective of the position of the loading coil... which is not consistent with experience that a larger loading coil is needed the further it is from the base. One of the proponents posted on eham, the following solution to a loading coil for 160m: "The VF of a 6" dia., 4 TPI coil on 160m would be about 0.02. Whatever number of degrees you want the coil to occupy, wind it accordingly.", note the independence of coil size and location on the monopole. Owen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|