On 3 Dec, 13:36, Cecil Moore wrote:
Gene Fuller wrote:
I don't believe anyone has actually challenged what Corum *says*. What
*has* been challenged is your misreading of the paper, especially the
required conditions for the validity of the analysis.

I very carefully applied the required conditions.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Cecil,
The bottom line of all this postulating is that YOU and only YOU were
visciferious about something being wrong with Tom and Roy's
experiment.
Whether you gave the correction in its propper fashion is of no
matter.
Thus a new old wifes tail was beaten down at the beginning, so
kudo's
to you while the others sulk.
Same thing happened to me with respect to adding time to both sides
of
the Gaussian equation where all ignored the fact that Dr Davis
provided the
mathematical proof. In both cases the group admitted no wrong but rest
assured
the flames will go on as if they were right and you were wrong.
This has happened many times before over the last decade with many
other gurus
who left rather than to descend to the level of the flame throwers.
W8TI left
for the same reasons but fortunately not away from the hobby itself.
One thing that does come out from this is that all is NOT known about
antennas despite the i9nsinuations of those who view themselves as
experts.
Every one of the pseudo experts on this group have been proved wrong
one
time or anather and yet they still flaunt themselves as experts.
It used to be that one should not just ask one expert but more than
one,
to which I add but none from this group.
Now every body, take a seat and watch Richard quote from McBeth
in a lovely white gown bought especially for the occasion.
Curtain up..Your cue Richerd/Lady Mc Beth....oh dear your
slip is showing once again.
Cecil move to the top of the table because YOU are worth the salt
while the present occupants can slink away while all observe
their embarisment
As I said ,
CURTAIN UP.....Lady McBeth, stage left,spotlight.
Mc Beth starts her weeping....
Art Unwin kb9mz....xg (UK)