Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Dec, 22:25, Richard Clark wrote:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 18:14:36 -0800 (PST), art wrote: I did not know that equation. Einstein said a lot of things and was often proved in error. Did he mention equilibrium or the other laws like: Every action has an equal and opposite reaction? Hi Arthur, Every equation describes equilibrium, by definition. For that matter how many laws of Newton did he put down? All of them. Any idea where I can read up on that and how he arrived at that conclusion? Seems odd that we have so many gravity centers in this universe and a neutral point never occurs.....anywhere. Not so. A simple example is called the "Trojan points." Some of those stationary things in the sky must be holding on to a piece of string tied to the moon Well, given the moon moves, the string must move whatever is tied to it. In short, there is nothing stationary anywhere. No. I do not have any books on Einstein but do have Planck and I don't recall him mentioning that.Is it just called Einsteins Law of ??????? General relativity. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC As with the convergence of energy vectors described in the Columbian lectures so is general relativity. Both are procedures that are being followed in an effort to find a path to GAT. As I stated before it often is not the destination that counts but what one learns on the journey . Both of these procedures have provided insights to the universe but neither proved to be the answer for Einsteins main quest which was GAT. Yes, a lot of theories have been produced by using these procedures some of which relate to our universe and some of these theories may prove to be correct but for the wrong reasons. Such was the making of the word "theory" which deviates from a standard when considering a "law". If you review Einsteins work in the search of GAT you will find that most of his theories by his peers which he often confided in so he is not immune to error. With respect to the moon and the sun you are quite correct tho I was being a bit vacitious, but it does show you are capable of serious debate when you have a mind to together with sufficient knoweledge to venture into unknown trails of thought, musings and deduction. Art Unwin KB9MZ.....xg (uk) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|