LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old December 8th 07, 03:50 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
art art is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,188
Default Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna

On 7 Dec, 22:25, Richard Clark wrote:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 18:14:36 -0800 (PST), art
wrote:

I did not know that equation. Einstein said a lot of things and
was often proved in error. Did he mention equilibrium or the
other laws like:
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction?


Hi Arthur,

Every equation describes equilibrium, by definition.

For that matter
how many laws of Newton did he put down?


All of them.

Any idea where I can read up on that and how he arrived at that
conclusion? Seems odd that we have so many gravity centers in this
universe and a neutral point never occurs.....anywhere.


Not so. A simple example is called the "Trojan points."

Some of those stationary things in the sky must be holding on to a
piece of string tied to the moon


Well, given the moon moves, the string must move whatever is tied to
it. In short, there is nothing stationary anywhere.

No. I do not have any books on Einstein but do have Planck and
I don't recall him mentioning that.Is it just called Einsteins Law
of ???????


General relativity.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


As with the convergence of energy vectors described
in the Columbian lectures so is general relativity.
Both are procedures that are being followed
in an effort to find a path to GAT. As I stated before
it often is not the destination that counts but what
one learns on the journey . Both of these procedures
have provided insights to the universe but neither
proved to be the answer for Einsteins main quest
which was GAT. Yes, a lot of theories have been produced
by using these procedures some of which relate to our universe
and some of these theories may prove to be correct
but for the wrong reasons. Such was the making of the word
"theory" which deviates from a standard when considering a "law".
If you review Einsteins work in the search of GAT you will
find that most of his theories by his peers which he often
confided in so he is not immune to error.
With respect to the moon and the sun you are quite correct tho
I was being a bit vacitious, but it does show you are capable
of serious debate when you have a mind to together with sufficient
knoweledge to venture into unknown trails of thought, musings
and deduction.
Art Unwin KB9MZ.....xg (uk)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Single Wire Antenna {Longwire / Random Wire Antenna} - What To Use : Antenna Tuner? and/or Pre-Selector? RHF Shortwave 20 December 31st 05 09:41 PM
Single Wire Antenna {Longwire / Random Wire Antenna} - What To Use : Antenna Tuner? and/or Pre-Selector? David Shortwave 0 December 28th 05 05:24 AM
Single Wire Antenna {Longwire / Random Wire Antenna} - What To Use : Antenna Tuner? and/or Pre-Selector? David Shortwave 3 December 27th 05 09:59 PM
Single Wire Antenna {Longwire / Random Wire Antenna} - What To Use : Antenna Tuner? and/or Pre-Selector? David Shortwave 0 December 27th 05 09:18 PM
Vincent antenna Allen Windhorn Antenna 3 May 24th 05 12:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017