Gene Fuller wrote:
As usual, you continue to take things out of context. That quote
specifically referred to the (kz-wt) "phase". Simple examination of the
ideal standing wave equation shows my quoted comment to be correct.

I know and you know that when you posted those technical
facts, you thought they supported W7EL's side and contra-
dicted mine. Surprise! W7EL was the one making outrageous
assertions, not me. I know and you know that you wish you
could take those remarks back because they contradict W7EL
but they are now preserved on Google.

The technical facts will eventually win out even if it
hairlips every guru on this newsgroup.

However, I have also pointed out on several occasions that there are
multiple definitions for phase.

We are using the EZNEC convention for "phase". Other
definitions do not matter in this context.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com