On 28 Nov, 23:35, Richard Clark wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:54:55 -0800, "Sal M. Onella"

wrote:
... and it does for me on 20 and 10. I don't know how many sets of dipole
elements can be connected at the same time, but I think it's more than the
two I have up there now. Richard gave the number five. That's why I said
I'm going to try a set for 40m.

You are going to give Art apoplexy by crediting me!

No that is not true.I have been reading your exchange with interest
For the last few days you have been comunicating without adding the
side stuff. I just don't understand what has happened but the change
makes you out to be a more reasonable fellow. But then I have been
caught before when you finally let the trap spring
so I am not in any hurry
Art
snip