FOR SALE - HOME BREW BALANCED LINE ANTENNA TUNER - TWIN ROLLERINDUCTORS
 

Michael Coslo wrote:

If I see the posts, I will reply. Cecil's crap in the mall was spot on.


Oh dear! I re-read my post, and it doesn't sound at all right! I should
have wrote "Cecil's crap in the mall *example* was spot on".

What I did write brings forth disturbing visualizations. So sorry about
that Cecil.....


- 73 de Mike N3LI -

FOR SALE - HOME BREW BALANCED LINE ANTENNA TUNER - TWIN ROLLERINDUCTORS
 

Michael Coslo wrote:
What I did write brings forth disturbing visualizations. So sorry
about that Cecil.....

Well Mike, I just thought you had joined the guru
gang who assert their Big Lies about me here almost
every day. :-) e.g. that I support the concept of
"average power waves", which I do not. Here is a
quote from my 2005 Worldradio magazine article:

''The term "power flow" has been avoided in favor of
"energy flow". Power is a measure of that energy flow
per unit time through a plane. Likewise, the EM fields
in the waves do the interfering. Powers, treated as
scalars, are incapable of interference.''

Want to wager how long it will be before I am, once
again, unethically accused of supporting the concept
of "waves of average power"?
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

FOR SALE - HOME BREW BALANCED LINE ANTENNA TUNER - TWIN ROLLERINDUCTORS
 

Cecil Moore wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote:
What I did write brings forth disturbing visualizations. So sorry
about that Cecil.....

Well Mike, I just thought you had joined the guru
gang who assert their Big Lies about me here almost
every day. :-) e.g. that I support the concept of
"average power waves", which I do not. Here is a
quote from my 2005 Worldradio magazine article:

''The term "power flow" has been avoided in favor of
"energy flow". Power is a measure of that energy flow
per unit time through a plane. Likewise, the EM fields
in the waves do the interfering. Powers, treated as
scalars, are incapable of interference.''

Want to wager how long it will be before I am, once
again, unethically accused of supporting the concept
of "waves of average power"?

There you go again, Cecil, writing about waves of average
power when everyone knows they don't exist.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH
(P.S. Is that unethical enough?)

FOR SALE - HOME BREW BALANCED LINE ANTENNA TUNER - TWIN ROLLERINDUCTORS
 

Tom Donaly wrote:
There you go again, Cecil, writing about waves of average
power when everyone knows they don't exist.

:-) I know they don't exist. W7EL knows that I know they
don't exist. Now if you can only get W7EL to stop falsely
accusing me of supporting the concept of "EM power waves"
you will have accomplished more than I have been able to
accomplish during the 21st century. If W7EL had not first
falsely written about me believing in "waves of average power",
I would not have to utter those words in defending myself.

I have not supported that concept since long before the
beginning of the 21st century. Jim Kelley convinced me
long ago that "power in an EM wave" is not a valid concept,
that the valid concept is "energy associated with an EM
wave". The energy is moving. The power is that energy
passing a fixed measurement point.

W7EL uses his considerable political power to try to
discredit people like me. One wonders why he chooses that
path instead of simply mounting a winning technical argument.
One wonders why he is unwilling to defend his use of
standing-wave current to try to measure the delay through
a loading coil.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

FOR SALE - HOME BREW BALANCED LINE ANTENNA TUNER - TWIN ROLLER INDUCTORS
 

Cecil Moore wrote in news:2gY3j.2398$Vq.840
@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com:

Michael Coslo wrote:
What I did write brings forth disturbing visualizations. So sorry
about that Cecil.....

Well Mike, I just thought you had joined the guru
gang who assert their Big Lies about me here almost
every day. :-)

Oh heavens no! I only know enough about antennas and their nuances to get
myself in trouble. I'm too ignorant to have a dog in this fight.


e.g. that I support the concept of
"average power waves", which I do not. Here is a
quote from my 2005 Worldradio magazine article:

''The term "power flow" has been avoided in favor of
"energy flow". Power is a measure of that energy flow
per unit time through a plane. Likewise, the EM fields
in the waves do the interfering. Powers, treated as
scalars, are incapable of interference.''

Want to wager how long it will be before I am, once
again, unethically accused of supporting the concept
of "waves of average power"?

Well, as long as no one pokes an eye out, I guess that boys will be boys.

And my guess is 1 post.. ;^)

- 73 de Mike N3LI -