Tom Donaly wrote:
I suggest you email Tom and ask him about his experiment. It doesn't
matter, though. Cecil will always argue, that, because Tom is wrong,
he, Cecil, must be right. In point of fact, Tom doesn't have to prove
Cecil wrong, ...

No, W8JI has to prove himself right since the onus of
proof is upon him for asserting the 3 ns delay through a
100 turn coil. If the delay through that 100T coil is not
3 ns, then my two-year-old assertion that the 3 ns delay
is impossible turns out to be true.

We had this out two years ago over on QRZ.com. Tom is incapable
of mistakes and therefore is incapable of changing his mind.
The same holds true for other gurus on this newsgroup.

(P.S. By now, you, and everyone else, should know that Cecil never
argues in good faith, ...

P.S. By now everyone should know that Tom Donaly attempts
to get readers to believe Big Lies about me. He and the
rest of the guru gang are more interested in saving
face than in technical facts. The 3 ns delay through a
100T coil is just one example. Reflected EM waves with
measurable voltages but zero energy content is another.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com