On 5 Dec, 19:54, "AI4QJ" wrote:
"Mike Kaliski" wrote in message

...







"AI4QJ" wrote in message
...

"art" wrote in message
...
Guy's
You must know that the holy grail of physics is GUT which is now
gyrating towards
relatavistic theory out of delusionment with Newton. Newtons laws are
based
around equilibrium with respect to gravitational forces. Maxwells laws
do not
but we are in the same universe so it is reasonable that both sciences
are
unified.
Gauss's theory of statics evolves around equilibrium with respect to a
group
of static particles held within the limits of a gravitational force
ie.
Newtons terminology.Adding a time varient brings the stage to a
electromagnetic
arrangement with respect to Maxwell. On the way we learn about
equilibrium
being maintained by adding full wave length radiators to Gaussian law.
We then see that the resultant of the transition from Gauss to Maxwell
type radiation formula becomes the equivalent of a "tank" circuit
where if the
radiator is diamagnetic the static particals can rest on its surface.
We also know that levitation is created when current flows followed by
a magnetic field
which ejects the particles outside the immediate gravitational field.
So with science being what it is, today where we have computor
programs built around
Maxwell's laws that can be used to deduce radiator dimensions with
respect to shape
and elevation positions when maximum horizontal polarisation is
required.
Thus modern day computors provide the answer as a full wavelength
radiator that is
at an angle to the earth of just under 80 degrees.
Now I had no input with resect to the design of Maxwellian computor
programs but I have
messed with some jigsaw puzzles where it is well known that the first
portion
placed on the table determines the speed of the process. So I invite
you to ask
your computor program to deduce the style of a radiator that produces
the maximum
horizontal polarization and then determine if Maxwell would have
helped himself
and all science by adding a time variant to Gaussian law and
incorporated it into his own?
Put the request into your Maxwellian based radiation computor program
if you are
not to lazy, where you will learn details of the GUT that Maxwell
failed to provide.
The holy grail is no more!
Best regards
Art Unwin...KB9MZ...xg (uk)

Adding a time variant (dt) to Gause's static law turns "charge"
(coulombs) into "current" (amperes). I think Maxwell's equations already
cover that concept and goes on to decribe the effects of changing
voltages and currents on electric and magnetic fields. I don't see any
new concepts being added here.

With regard to unification theory, I sure would like to see that in my
lifetime but probably will not. There may simply be no direct
correlation between gravitational, electrical and the strong and weak
nuclear forces. Why MUST there be a unifier? No unification may have been
intended ;-)

Light is distorted by gravity
Light is propagated by photons
Photons are characterised as an oscillating packet of electrical and
magnetic fields
Photons are emitted and absorbed by electrons which encircle an atomic
neucleus
Atomic nucleii are held together by the strong and weak nuclear forces
Atomic nucleii have mass which gives rise to gravity (which distorts
light)

How much more unification is needed?

Simplistic, but does it really have to be much more complicated than this
at a practical (everyday) level?

Proving this mathematically is a real nightmare, which probably goes to
show that it is our understanding of mathematics that is lacking rather
than some inherent error in the way the universe works.

Agree completely. But I don't think it has anything to do with diamagnetic
materials and loose electrons being levitated due to a relationship between
electric and gravitational forces whose relationship maxwell missed
somewhere along the way.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I know you are a newby to physics and you stated "but I don't think"
But I want you to think about the materials that are selected for
radiation.
Are they all of a specific type? Which has this levitation effect
connection
on all or some of these materials ? What is the connection with
respect to
tank circuits and oscillation? Where do oxide particles come into the
picture?
Where does the equilibrium or gravitational factors of Newton blend
in
with the electromagnetic phenomina. Where does the particulates come
from that
for a external layer that is called a "skin". Why do some decay and
others do not.What does it mean when a particle escapes from the
immediate
gravitational borders as alluded to by Gauss e.t.c
None of this is mentioned by Maxwell other than the basic law created
by intuition but without the associated facts.So to answer the
questions
about which you "don't think" you now have to be a detective yourself
to
provide any possible direction as an alternate.Suggestion, look up
the
definitions of equilibrium and gravitation to see exactly how those
words
became interactive in the minds of the masters in the 18th century and
mull
in your mind the implications that they have with respect to the
universe
or nature, which ever you prefer. Also look up G.U.T. to see why
physics
attach so much importance to the subject and again mull in your mind
why
there is so much research and time in the subject of which you
"don't
think" about. But then I am asking to much of you to try to
understand
radiation or even antenna computor programs.
Art