![]() |
|
sci.physics.electromag NEEDS YOU!
All you experts, there are confused posters on sci.physics.electromag that
need your assistance! Go take a look at some of these threads and please lend them some of your infinite knowledge: For everyone: How Far Away from Your Body Should Your Computer Be? For those of you confusing Gauss with other things: Electrostatic Induction A special one for Art: MOST Electrons UN-charged Cecil needed for this one: can we see the electromagnetic spectrum? I have no idea what this guy means: Faraday's law of induction. |
sci.physics.electromag NEEDS YOU!
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:17:02 GMT, Dave wrote:
All you experts, there are confused posters on sci.physics.electromag that need your assistance! Go take a look at some of these threads and please lend them some of your infinite knowledge: For everyone: How Far Away from Your Body Should Your Computer Be? For those of you confusing Gauss with other things: Electrostatic Induction A special one for Art: MOST Electrons UN-charged Cecil needed for this one: can we see the electromagnetic spectrum? I have no idea what this guy means: Faraday's law of induction. There's enough trolling going on in this ng without folks going off to look for more time wasting diversions. |
sci.physics.electromag NEEDS YOU!
Spamm Trappe wrote:
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:17:02 GMT, Dave wrote: All you experts, there are confused posters on sci.physics.electromag that need your assistance! Go take a look at some of these threads and please lend them some of your infinite knowledge: For everyone: How Far Away from Your Body Should Your Computer Be? For those of you confusing Gauss with other things: Electrostatic Induction A special one for Art: MOST Electrons UN-charged Cecil needed for this one: can we see the electromagnetic spectrum? I have no idea what this guy means: Faraday's law of induction. There's enough trolling going on in this ng without folks going off to look for more time wasting diversions. Yeah. Besides, are you really sure you want to inflict the r.r.a.a.denizens on some other newsgroup? |
sci.physics.electromag NEEDS YOU!
Dave wrote:
All you experts, there are confused posters on sci.physics.electromag that need your assistance! Go take a look at some of these threads and please lend them some of your infinite knowledge: For everyone: How Far Away from Your Body Should Your Computer Be? For those of you confusing Gauss with other things: Electrostatic Induction A special one for Art: MOST Electrons UN-charged Cecil needed for this one: can we see the electromagnetic spectrum? I have no idea what this guy means: Faraday's law of induction. I remember the days when we'd have to go clear to the park in San Francisco to hear the guy standing on the box ranting about his pet theories. And now we can do it with the click of a mouse in the comfort of our homes. Ain't technology marvelous! We're filling up our minds with garbage Garbage, garbage, garbage, garbage, garbage What will we do when there's nothing left to read And there's nothing left to need And there's nothing left to watch And there's nothing left to touch And there's nothing left to walk upon And nothing left to ponder on Nothing left to see And nothing left to be but . . . Garbage, garbage, garbage, garbage, garbage -- Bill Steele, "Garbage", as performed by Pete Seeger Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
sci.physics.electromag NEEDS YOU!
"Robert Smts" wrote in message landnet.com... Spamm Trappe wrote: On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:17:02 GMT, Dave wrote: All you experts, there are confused posters on sci.physics.electromag that need your assistance! Go take a look at some of these threads and please lend them some of your infinite knowledge: For everyone: How Far Away from Your Body Should Your Computer Be? For those of you confusing Gauss with other things: Electrostatic Induction A special one for Art: MOST Electrons UN-charged Cecil needed for this one: can we see the electromagnetic spectrum? I have no idea what this guy means: Faraday's law of induction. There's enough trolling going on in this ng without folks going off to look for more time wasting diversions. Yeah. Besides, are you really sure you want to inflict the r.r.a.a.denizens on some other newsgroup? it just sounds like they could use some of the inifinite wisdom that gets spewed on here. some of the perpetual blowhards on here would fit right in with that group. And Art may even be a candidate for alt.sci.physics.new-theories. His ideas are as good or better than most of them that get posted on there! |
sci.physics.electromag NEEDS YOU!
"Dave" wrote in message news:UQh8j.18650$R4.4463@trndny05... "Robert Smts" wrote in message landnet.com... Spamm Trappe wrote: On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:17:02 GMT, Dave wrote: All you experts, there are confused posters on sci.physics.electromag that need your assistance! Go take a look at some of these threads and please lend them some of your infinite knowledge: For everyone: How Far Away from Your Body Should Your Computer Be? For those of you confusing Gauss with other things: Electrostatic Induction A special one for Art: MOST Electrons UN-charged Cecil needed for this one: can we see the electromagnetic spectrum? I have no idea what this guy means: Faraday's law of induction. There's enough trolling going on in this ng without folks going off to look for more time wasting diversions. Yeah. Besides, are you really sure you want to inflict the r.r.a.a.denizens on some other newsgroup? it just sounds like they could use some of the inifinite wisdom that gets spewed on here. some of the perpetual blowhards on here would fit right in with that group. And Art may even be a candidate for alt.sci.physics.new-theories. His ideas are as good or better than most of them that get posted on there! just for Art here is a quote from the un-charged electron thread: On Dec 10, 7:08 pm, wrote: 6 UN-CHARGED ELECTRONS It is PRETTY OBVIOUS, from observation and experiment, that static electricity BEHAVES MUCH DIFFERENTLY than current electricity. The real reason for this, according to the comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the Physical Universe developed by the late Physicist Dewey B. Larson, is that static electrons are charged, while most electrons flowing through a wire at low or moderate voltage are UN-CHARGED. Static electrons VIGOROUSLY REPEL each other. If current electrons flowing through a wire behaved like that, then they would all REPEL each other toward the OUTSIDE of the wire and flow ONLY along its OUTER SURFACE. This would make the conductance of a wire proportional to its CIRCUMFERENCE. But the conductance is in fact proportional to CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA, indicating that current electrons flow throughout the ENTIRE VOLUME of the wire. "Skin effect" shows up ONLY with radio-frequency alternating current, and for reasons related to the inductance of the wire (induced back-emf at the center of the wire) rather than from any charges. "Skin effect" is essentially ZERO at 0 frequency (DC). The solution to the mystery of the vacuum tube is that electrons on the cathode are GIVEN a charge by the hot filament, and then most of them GIVE UP their charge when striking the plate, thereby heating it up, the charge being converted back to heat. (The "law" of conservation of charge is ERRONEOUS. Electric charges can be EASILY created or destroyed.) UN-charged electrons are MASS-LESS. Voltage is really a PRESSURE on electrons, which occupy space in a wire, and resist compression, like water molecules in a pipe. See also my Article "ELECTRONS IN SPACE" at http://members.aol.com/rem460/electrns.txtor at http://www.geocities.com/remspiral7/electrns.txt. A WEALTH of Information about the comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the Physical Universe developed by the late Physicist Dewey B. Larson can be found at the web sitehttp://www.rstheory.com. Robert E. McElwaine B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC http://members.aol.com/rem547PLUS http://members.aol.com/rem460 Preserve BOTH on CD-R and PRINT-OUTS ALSOhttp://www.geocities.com/remspiral7/ P.S.: PASS IT ON ! "EVERYTHING you know is WRONG." "The Truth IS STRANGER than fiction." "The Truth is ALWAYS the FIRST CASUALTY OF WAR." "OFFICIAL LIES are ALWAYS the BIGGEST LIES OF ALL." "The more things change, the more they STAY THE SAME." |
sci.physics.electromag NEEDS YOU!
Dave wrote: it just sounds like they could use some of the inifinite wisdom that gets spewed on here. some of the perpetual blowhards on here would fit right in with that group. Hi Dave - We apparently each have our own approach for trying to quash the spewing of claptrap science on r.r.a.a. I wish you better luck with yours than I've had with mine. 73, ac6xg |
sci.physics.electromag NEEDS YOU!
Jim Kelley wrote:
We apparently each have our own approach for trying to quash the spewing of claptrap science on r.r.a.a. I wish you better luck with yours than I've had with mine. Reflected EM waves existing without energy is one of the bigger claptrap science concepts on this newsgroup. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
sci.physics.electromag NEEDS YOU!
Jim Kelley wrote:
Dave wrote: it just sounds like they could use some of the inifinite wisdom that gets spewed on here. some of the perpetual blowhards on here would fit right in with that group. Hi Dave - We apparently each have our own approach for trying to quash the spewing of claptrap science on r.r.a.a. I wish you better luck with yours than I've had with mine. 73, ac6xg Oh gesus, more than a mind can bear ... THREAD PLONK! JS |
sci.physics.electromag NEEDS YOU!
"Jim Kelley" wrote in message ... Dave wrote: it just sounds like they could use some of the inifinite wisdom that gets spewed on here. some of the perpetual blowhards on here would fit right in with that group. Hi Dave - We apparently each have our own approach for trying to quash the spewing of claptrap science on r.r.a.a. I wish you better luck with yours than I've had with mine. 73, ac6xg i tried your method... decided instead to just plonk all those guys and just watch your and maybe one or two other logical responders. give up, it won't work, learn to use the kill file and enjoy the peace and quiet. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:39 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com