On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:38:25 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:

As I said above, if you have a constant power source,
the energy in that stub would increase without bounds.
The forward power is certainly not limited to the source
power. The source is only having to supply the losses in
the stub. The stub could be storing magnitudes more energy
than your calculation.

The world's answer for energy shortage. Put in 100W and get 10 times
or more out. All courtesy of the modern miracle of superconduction
which is available TODAY!

But wait. That is not all. For the first 4 billion customers:

As pointed out above, your logic is flawed. I estimate
that with 100 watts being fed into the dipole and 100
watts being radiated from the dipole, the forward power
is about 500 watts and the reflected power is about
400 watts at the feedpoint of the 1/2WL dipole.

Our Soon-to-be-announced FORWARD WAVE DIPOLE will be arriving under
your Christmas tree in the future. Imagine applying only 100W to
enjoy the benefits of radiating 500W without the need for those
roasting hot linears that cost a fortune.

As a Bonus! Plug your rig into our patent pending energy stub that
requires less than 10W to power your rig, and here's a Christmas gift
you can take to the mountains in your backpack!

When was the last time your rig could radiate 500W for an hour from 10
AAA batteries? Better living through the bright promise of photons.
Look for our trademarked slogan:
"It's more than headlights in your eyes, dear."

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC