Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 28, 2:44*pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote: I suppose this non-sequitor means that you agree that an ideal section of transmission line, just like an ideal inductor and capacitor, will store energy forever if provided with the appropriate initial conditions, but do not wish to admit it. I freely admit that it can happen in your mind (like leaping tall buildings at a single bound). Thought experiments do usually occur within the mind. This one is no different. I do not believe it can happen in a real-world situation. That is good, for it is unlikely, though with superconductors one might come close. But if you can demonstrate lossless transmission lines and lossless inductors on the bench, be my guest and probably win a Nobel Prize in the process. More intrigue. This path has been trod before. Begin with an experiment using ideal elements. Get uncomfortably close to some truth. Declare the experiment invalid because it could not happen in the "real world". It would be more valuable were you to confront the demons rather than take the "real world" escape. An intriguing thought experiment is to take several of these sections with stored energy (with the proper phase relationship) and connect them together. Do the reflections present at the ends of the short sections suddenly disappear when the sections are connected to form a longer line? Are the reflections now only occurring at the ends of the longer section? Reflections are impossible except at physical impedance discontinuities. There are zero reflections at a point in a smooth fixed Z0 section of transmission line. Cut the line and you get 100% reflection. That is why it is so intriguing. The voltage and current conditions have not changed, and yet, befo reflections, after: none. That's why your assertions of "no change" don't make sense. Are you claiming that the voltages or currents have changed? Identify a measurable value that has changed and the proof will be yours. You would have us believe that short circuit to open circuit is "no change"??? If it does not change the circuit conditions, i.e. voltages or currents. If that is true, there's "no change" between a shorted 1/4WL stub and an open 1/4WL stub. Invalid generalization. We were discussing a specific circuit, not any old 1/4WL stub. ...Keith |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standing Wave Phase | Antenna | |||
Standing wave on feeders | Antenna | |||
Dipole with standing wave - what happens to reflected wave? | Antenna | |||
Newbie ?: I've Built A Simple 1/4 Wave Dipole for 2 Mtrs. Could IMake a1/2 Wave? | Homebrew | |||
What is a traveling-wave antenna? | Antenna |