| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gene Fuller wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: Incidentally, this is a different convention from the field of optics. That is a rather curious comment. Why do you say the convention is different for optics? There are no commonly used "voltage" or "current" descriptions in optics, so analysis is done using E-fields and H-fields. Otherwise there is no difference in convention between optical and RF. In optics, to the best of my knowledge, there is no separate reflection coefficient for the E-field and the H-field. If true, that fact alone implies a different convention from the field of RF. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Standing Wave Phase | Antenna | |||
| Standing wave on feeders | Antenna | |||
| Dipole with standing wave - what happens to reflected wave? | Antenna | |||
| Newbie ?: I've Built A Simple 1/4 Wave Dipole for 2 Mtrs. Could IMake a1/2 Wave? | Homebrew | |||
| What is a traveling-wave antenna? | Antenna | |||