Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Gene Fuller wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Incidentally, this is a different convention from the field of optics. That is a rather curious comment. Why do you say the convention is different for optics? There are no commonly used "voltage" or "current" descriptions in optics, so analysis is done using E-fields and H-fields. Otherwise there is no difference in convention between optical and RF. In optics, to the best of my knowledge, there is no separate reflection coefficient for the E-field and the H-field. If true, that fact alone implies a different convention from the field of RF. There is no difference. The H-field is related to the E-field by the properties of the medium. The current is related to the voltage by the properties (Z0) of the medium. It is therefore possible to calculate a single reflection coefficient. It is the same situation at RF as at optical frequencies. If you are referring to the sign change of the current reflection for open vs. short circuit, then there is still no difference. The formula for the reflection coefficient contain terms that change sign depending on the relative properties of the media. It matters not whether one is dealing with HF or visible light. 73, Gene W4SZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standing Wave Phase | Antenna | |||
Standing wave on feeders | Antenna | |||
Dipole with standing wave - what happens to reflected wave? | Antenna | |||
Newbie ?: I've Built A Simple 1/4 Wave Dipole for 2 Mtrs. Could IMake a1/2 Wave? | Homebrew | |||
What is a traveling-wave antenna? | Antenna |