Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 05:42:16 -0800, Roger wrote:
Several responders discussed the Norton or Thévenin equivalent circuits. These circuits assume steady state conditions, and are intended to be replacements for groups of components. A very useful concept, but not appropriate for startup excitation of a transmission line unless the intent was to investigate the source AND transmission line as a system. Hi Roger, Quite a bizarre stance. Do you regularly come to these points of view without further thought, elaboration, or analysis? It seems you have assigned some remarkable characteristics to the Norton and Thevenin source and you don't offer us anything substantive beyond what would be called "Arthur's proposition." To cut to the chase, Norton and Thevenin sources are appropriate to network analysis irrespective of your perception. You should look closer at your issues of difficulty because it does not reside in their classic application to classic situations. More later. I as still thinking about the "perfect power source". That's fine, but it is now turning into a mantra rather than a productive examination. You would do well to spill your guts as to why you commit so much of the calendar to this thought. Alone, it is as meaningful as announcing that one is thinking about "cold fusion." 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standing Wave Phase | Antenna | |||
Standing wave on feeders | Antenna | |||
Dipole with standing wave - what happens to reflected wave? | Antenna | |||
Newbie ?: I've Built A Simple 1/4 Wave Dipole for 2 Mtrs. Could IMake a1/2 Wave? | Homebrew | |||
What is a traveling-wave antenna? | Antenna |