Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:28:16 -0600, "David G. Nagel"
wrote: Einstein's equations use the speed of light in a vacuum, Michaelson conducted his experiments in unstandardized air. c in air does change and c(air) can be exceeded. Hi David, And thus it follows that Michaelson's "faster than light" speed is due to the effects of the atmosphere? I would believe from the conventions offered by Snell's law, predating this work, that all the scientists would have been astonished at this inversion of expectations. But we know better. The speed of light's shift in speed would have been far in excess of the difference found between 1926 and 1956, if due to the presence of the atmosphere - and its effects were well considered at the time. No, this is simply a matter of experimental error as the range of speed has over the years tightened. However, all of this begs the issue why would Einstein's work (theoretical not experimental) pivot on a number that fluctuates with time, over time? In fact it does not, and Einstein did not confirm the speed of light, nor did his theory preclude nor deny Cherenkov's observation of solid matter (neutrons albeit) traveling faster than quite obvious light (irrespective of how fast it was "defined" to travel). Einstein has not been limited to the vagaries of observation from any experimenter and that is his accomplishment. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Radio Waves help!! | Antenna | |||
On the really Short Waves... | Shortwave | |||
Traveling Waves, Power Waves,..., Any Waves,... | Antenna | |||
radio waves | Swap |