Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote: 1. Winding a half wavelength of wire doesn't make an antenna which acts like a half wavelength antenna. A helical antenna section can be treated as a piece of transmission line with a velocity factor and a characteristic impedance. Knowing the velocity factor allows one to calculate the approximate length of the section. On my web page, I have an EXCEL file that will estimate the VF and Z0 of a helical antenna: http://www.w5dxp.com/coilZ0VF.xls To see how this might work, let's assume a 1/2WL helical dipole for 40m using a helical of 2 inches diameter and 2 turns per inch on 7.2 MHz. If the value at A7 on the spreadsheet is less than one, the VF and Z0 will be in the correct ballpark - probably within 15%. For such a coil, the VF is calculated to be 0.207. 1/2WL at 7.2 MHz is 68.3 feet. So how long should the coil be to be 1/2WL long? 68.3 feet times 0.207 = ~14 feet Of course, this is not an exact length and must have turns subtracted (or added) to bring it to resonance on 7.2 MHz. Since end effects are not included, the dipole will probably resonate on a frequency lower than 7.2 MHz. Removing turns will then bring it to resonance. Use half of the above for a 1/4WL vertical section approximately 7 feet high. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thanks Roy and Cecil. I'll work on this using your comments/suggestions. I'm in a vy antenna unfriendly area: an apartment in the air shaft of the bldg. So I'm abt 40' from free-air on all four sides. Fortunately, I'm on the top floor, so I'm trying to get a "stealth" antenna to place on the roof: something that would be easy to set up/take down. The helical fit that description. But, I'm running QRP (abt 5W) and, taking into consideration what Roy said abt power & efficiency, I'm probably not getting anything out. One good thing abt this antenna is, for it's size, it does receive better than the random-length wire (abt a 50' rectangle) I had been using inside my apartment. It does have good bandwith - but, as Roy stated this indicates low radiation resistance. Cecil, I'll work w/ your s/s and play around some more w/ the helical (just for the fun of it, ya know ;-) ). If this doesn't work out I'll try a linearly loaded dipole that N5ESE has on his website. Thanks to both for your advice. 73 -- MGFoster:::mgf00 at earthlink decimal-point net (KI6OFN) Oakland, CA (USA) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBR6t0ZoechKqOuFEgEQIP2gCeJNZwXLJBiYBobUw+092wRM X8EZMAmwWx R2zVVJ6RDCN+KlrEm4TopHxP =9XiC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Spiro-Helical Antenna and a little more {Yeah Slinkys !} . . . | Shortwave | |||
A few Helical Antenna question | Antenna | |||
Helical Resonators | General | |||
Helical Stub Antenna | Antenna |