Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Zo of two wire open line
"Owen Duffy" wrote in message ... I have found two common expressions for the Zo of a two wire line in space. One expression is Zo=276log(D/d). The second is Zo=120acosh(D/d). I have been searching for information on whether the acosh expression takes into account proximity effect. Because it does not consider conductivity or permeability of the conductors, one wonders if it does. Laport has a graph that shows the log expression and a proximity corrected line which turns out to be a very close fit to the acosh line over the range that he plots. The curves are compared in http://www.vk1od.net/balun/Ruthroff/R07.png . I have another reference, Marchand (1947), which gives the log expression then, the acosh expresssion and says "The hyperbolic cosine is obtained because the currents are attracted to one another and become more and more confined to the inside surface as the wires are brought closer together." This suggests (states) that the acosh expression (fully) accounts for proximity effect on Zo. Comments? Owen I must be doing something wrong. 276log(2)=83 but looks like about 150 on your graph. No? John |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Zo of two wire open line
"John KD5YI" wrote in
news:Z2srj.1036$qw4.677@trnddc02: I must be doing something wrong. 276log(2)=83 but looks like about 150 on your graph. No? Sorry, that expression should be 276log(2D/d) for a consistent meaning of D and d. (Some people use wire radius and some, diameter... so D here is centre to centre distance, and d is diameter.) Owen |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OPEN WIRE LINE | Antenna | |||
Open wire feedlines | General | |||
WTB: 2" open wire spreaders | Equipment | |||
WTB: 2" spreaders for open wire line | Antenna | |||
WTB: 2" open wire spreaders | Equipment |