Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote in
: On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:08:33 GMT, Owen Duffy wrote: I have found two common expressions for the Zo of a two wire line in space. One expression is Zo=276log(D/d). The second is Zo=120acosh(D/d). Hi Owen, I have the following expressions found in "Reference Data for Radio Engineers," 22-22 Transmission Lines: Zo = 120 acosh(D/d) Zo ~ 276 log(2D/d) Zo ~ 120 Ln(2D/d) where the symbol ~ means "approximately equal to." Thanks Richard. Yes, I saw those in that publication. ln(x) is a good approximation of acosh(x) for large x, so that explains one approximation, and the log expression is just a scaling of the ln expression. I put some importance on the difference between the approximately equal and unqualified equal signs. If the acosh expression fully accounts for proximity effect, it is interesting that it is independent of frequency, conductivity, and permeability. It would be nice to find a derivation. I think if you derive C and L from first principles, you don't get the same curve as acosh... which suggests that acosh is account for something that L and C from first principles (assuming uniform current distribution) doesn't. Owen |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OPEN WIRE LINE | Antenna | |||
Open wire feedlines | General | |||
WTB: 2" open wire spreaders | Equipment | |||
WTB: 2" spreaders for open wire line | Antenna | |||
WTB: 2" open wire spreaders | Equipment |