Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24 feb, 15:15, "Francesco L." wrote:
Hi Francesco, On the ground, or elevated? Both cases please. I did a reasearch on arrl antenna book, low band dxing and newsgroups and got a bit confused, so I need more tips. There are too many options, I mean: at a certain height above the ground, atop the roof, on the ground and so on, so I'm trying to collect as much info as possible in order to get the overall picture. Thanks Hello Francesco, It depends heavily on the antenna. When your antenna is an electrically half wave radiator, the input impedance is in the kOhm range and "ground" becomes less important. Many CB 27 MHz antennas are half wave antennas (without any radials). For other lengths, "ground" is important. The smaller your antenna the lower the radiation resistance (=higher feed current), and the more important the "ground" system. For fertile wet ground and buried radials, the 0.25lambda is no longer a magic number as the attenuation is very high. For dry Rock/sand, dielectric properties dictate and some standing waves appear in the ground conductor. As long as the real part of the ground impedance is less then the real part of the input impedance of the radiator, it is OK. If possible, I prefer elevated radials. In many cases, they can be shorter than 0.25 lambda (add more of them). The disadvantage is that your floating ground becomes capacitive and you get a common mode voltage on the cable screen, so you should add a common mode choke. When you make them very short, the electrical situation is upside down: your radiator functions as ground and your floating radial network is the antenna. An advantage of floating radials and the high end of HF is that your radiation center is higher and ground properties become less important, so you can have less loss (also in nearby structures) and less noise from electrical equipment. To give a more precise answer, one need to know your local conditions, structural limitations, frequency and antenna type to be used, etc. For low frequency, "Ground systems as a factor in antenna systems" (Brown, Lewis Epstein, 1937) maybe interesting for you in case of buried radials. I know this doesn't answer your question, but I hope it will help you a bit. Best regards, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl (Dutch). |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Radials -- the same length or not??? | Antenna | |||
Length & number of radials again | Antenna | |||
Length & number of radials | Antenna | |||
Length & number of radials | Equipment | |||
Length & number of radials | Homebrew |