Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Francesco L. wrote:
"I was wondering if it`s possible to shorten the radials from the standard 1/4 wavelength to another value, a smaller one." Elevated radials are resonant, but the 20th edition of the ARRL Antenna Book has Fig 47 on page 6-26 showing radials shortened by capacitive or inductive loading. Buried radials have their resonance swamped by earth conductance. Such radials are surely effective when the greatest current drops nearly to zero at the ends, farthest from the vertical radiator, No interconnections far from the origins of the radials are desirable as they only encourage circulating current which only adds to loss. E.A. Laport has Figs. 217 and 218 on page 119 of "Radio Antenna Engineering" taken from Brown, Lewis, and Epstein which show field strength variies versus 2, 15, 30, 60, or 113 ground radials of 0.412 or 0.137 lambda, at antenna heights up to 100 degrees, so that you can see what the shorter radials cost you. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Radials -- the same length or not??? | Antenna | |||
Length & number of radials again | Antenna | |||
Length & number of radials | Antenna | |||
Length & number of radials | Equipment | |||
Length & number of radials | Homebrew |