| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 29 Feb 2008 00:51:16 GMT, "Ed_G"
wrote: Our ARES group plans on installing an Inverted V antenna on the second story flat roof edge of a local building. The antenna mast is 13 feet tall above the roof edge. The Inverted V will run parallel the edge of the roof and be approximately 35 - 40 feet per leg. Our primary operations will be 80/75/40M with a desired ability on 60M. The building custodian/owner will not tolerate open wire feedline with its associated standoffs due to aesthetic considerations, so we must feed this antenna with coax fastened to the mast. At the base of the mast, on the roof, we will be using an SGC-237 antenna coupler. The above setup is a given, with no room for compromise. My questions for this group are as follows: Would we be better feeding the above antenna feedpoint with twin coax runs, using the center conductors as a 'balanced' feedline, or would we be better of using a single coax to the feedline? In either case, the coax runs will not exceed 20 feet and we must accept the losses in them. Email response from SGC seems to indicate we would be better off with a single feedline, but I am dubious about the SGC Tech Rep's response since he/she does not seem concerned about feedline radiation. Also, what recomendations do you guys have for use of a balun? I believe, at the least, we would need a 1:1 balun at the Input of the SGC coupler so as to keep RF from getting back down the shield and into the building. SGC response seems to indiate they don't think a balun is necessary anywhere, which is another reason I am not thrilled with their response. Comments? Ed K7AAT My SGC-237 is hard to mess up. Where ever you attach the wire to the tuner is the beginning of the antenna. The coax attach will simply be a matched line to the transceiver. I would be inclined to simply attach the coax to the inverted V as you outlined and use it. The antenna is in an environment that will not model well. The radiation from the coax will have an effect on the aggregate performance but nothing you can really measure. Although I doubt anyone can explain just how it works, the SGC-237 and the wire you have described will work fine. Modern antenna tuners perform a lot like Magic in my estimation. My own feeble experiments have led me to believe that it is worthwhile to put an antenna analyzer on the configuration and make sure that the array is NOT resonant on any frequency of interest. The tuner seems to like that best. Power supply: I have a very old telephone power supply tweaked down to 12 volts. I leave it on 24/7. John Ferrell W8CCW "Life is easier if you learn to plow around the stumps" |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Question on dipole SWR problem | Antenna | |||
| dipole question | Antenna | |||
| Low dipole performance question | Antenna | |||
| Dipole question | CB | |||
| Dipole Length Question | Antenna | |||