| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Antenna tuners 'like' antennas that are 'too long' better than
antennas that are 'too short'. That doesn't say anything about how well that 'too long'/'too short' antenna will perform, just that the average tuner will find it easier to deal with one that's 'too long'. (Easier to 'cram' more capacitance into a tuner than inductance.) If this antenna is a doublet, 'balanced', why would you need a 'groundplane'? And while I'd guess that it'll never be 'ideal', the building is acting as a 'groundplane' anyway, sort of. - 'Doc (What am I not understanding about the situation?) |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Antenna tuners 'like' antennas that are 'too long' better than antennas that are 'too short'. That doesn't say anything about how well that 'too long'/'too short' antenna will perform, just that the average tuner will find it easier to deal with one that's 'too long'. (Easier to 'cram' more capacitance into a tuner than inductance.) If this antenna is a doublet, 'balanced', why would you need a 'groundplane'? And while I'd guess that it'll never be 'ideal', the building is acting as a 'groundplane' anyway, sort of. - 'Doc (What am I not understanding about the situation?) I don't think you are missing anything; your comments sound reasonable to me. The building is the nearly new local firehouse HQ. The Chief and staff have outlined very strict parameters for our antenna location and setup. They fabricated the aluminum mast and will install it on the side of the building per their own design. Even at that, they gritted their teeth at the visual impact it has. No stand-off supported open ladder line for us! We must work with this and I don't see any feed alternative than coax. The only thing we 'may' have some flexibility with is the length of the antenna. ( Sorry Cecil, I guess I should have mentioned that up front ). We are limited to the length of the side of the building, which I estimated would give us up to 40 feet of element from the top of the mast. However, in hindsignt, I believe we could at that end point drop some additional length down off the end for a longer antenna.... would probably give us better operation on 75 & 80. Ed |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ed_G wrote:
They fabricated the aluminum mast and will install it on the side of the building per their own design. Get them to fabricate a piece of fiberglass tubing and all your problems will disappear. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Get them to fabricate a piece of fiberglass tubing and all your problems will disappear. I fully agree, but we have absolutely no input in regards to the mast they have provided, and to attempt to persuade them otherwise would only jeopardize the situaion, so we must accept what they have provided and work with it. Ed |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ed_G wrote:
Get them to fabricate a piece of fiberglass tubing and all your problems will disappear. I fully agree, but we have absolutely no input in regards to the mast they have provided, and to attempt to persuade them otherwise would only jeopardize the situaion, so we must accept what they have provided and work with it. There is someone, somewhere, who has the authority to change the mast from aluminum to fiberglass for the purpose of multiplying your radiation efficiency by a factor of 7. I would seek that person out and bend his/her ear. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is someone, somewhere, who has the authority to change the mast from aluminum to fiberglass for the purpose of multiplying your radiation efficiency by a factor of 7. I would seek that person out and bend his/her ear. Believe me, Cecil, that is not the case here. This is a very small community. The Fire Chief and his Deputy have ultimate authority over this building. Besides, to attempt to go over his head would merely jeopardize the good relations we already have which allowed us to get this far anyway. We'll leave well enough alone and work with what we have. If it weren't for the fact that we need operation on 3589 & 3980, ~7090 & 7248, and hopefully 60M, we'd probably have just gone with a trapped wire antenna off this mast instead of using the SGC-237 ( which we already possess). Thanks. Ed |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ed_G wrote:
There is someone, somewhere, who has the authority to change the mast from aluminum to fiberglass for the purpose of multiplying your radiation efficiency by a factor of 7. I would seek that person out and bend his/her ear. Believe me, Cecil, that is not the case here. This is a very small community. The Fire Chief and his Deputy have ultimate authority over this building. If the goal of those guys is to sabotage amateur radio communications, they have probably succeeded. It's like them going to fight a fire with big holes in the hoses. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Question on dipole SWR problem | Antenna | |||
| dipole question | Antenna | |||
| Low dipole performance question | Antenna | |||
| Dipole question | CB | |||
| Dipole Length Question | Antenna | |||