Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote: When the instantaneous energy flows are examined it can be seen that Prs is not equal to 50 W plus Pref. That is irrelevant. The power (irradiance) model doesn't apply to instantaneous energy and power. Hecht says as much in "Optics". Nobody has ever claimed that the energy/power analysis applies to instantaneous values. The energy/power values are all based on RMS voltages and currents. There is no such thing as an instantaneous RMS value. Interesting. Do you also use only the RMS phase and RMS interference to come up with your RMS answers? 8-) 73, Gene W4SZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
WTD: Paul Harvey Rest of the Story broadcasts from Sep 1 thru 6 | Broadcasting |