Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roger Sparks wrote:
The dissipation in the source resistor should be the sum of instantaneous energy flows from both source (forward) and reflected energy flows. We would not expect that the instantaneous energy flow would be equal from both source and reflection because of the sine wave nature of the energy flow. The key question: Is the square of the sum of the two voltages equal to the sum of the squares of the two voltages? If yes, there is no interference and it is valid to add the powers directly as Keith has done. If no, interference exists and it is *INVALID* to add the powers directly as Keith has done. Every EE was warned about superposing powers at the sophomore level if not before. This is why. So what we need to know is: Is [Vfor(t) + Vref(t)]^2 equal to Vfor(t)^2 + Vref(t)^2 ??? Does [70.7v*cos(wt) + 42.4v*cos(wt+90)]^2 equal [70.7v*cos(wt)]^2 + [42.4v*cos(wt+90)]^2 ??? Is 2[70.7v*cos(wt)*42.4v*cos(wt+90)] always zero??? The answer is obviously 'NO' so Keith's direct addition of powers, i.e. superposition of powers, is invalid as it always is when interference is present. When the interference term is properly taken into account, the instantaneous dissipation in the source resistor will no doubt equal the dissipation from the forward wave plus the dissipation from the reflected wave plus the interference term which is minus for destructive interference and plus for constructive interference. The interference will average out to zero over each single complete cycle. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
WTD: Paul Harvey Rest of the Story broadcasts from Sep 1 thru 6 | Broadcasting |