Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keith Dysart wrote:
So I am summing the instantaneous flows for the two contributors of energy. An invalid thing to do when interference is present. Reference EE-201 to find out when and why [V1(t)^2 + V2(t)^2] is NOT equal to [V1(t) + V2(t)]^2. The whole premise and assertion that the dissipation in the source resistor is equal to 50w plus the reflected power is based on the condition that (V1^2 + V2^2) is equal to (V1 + V2)^2 Since you did NOT satisfy that condition, it logically follows that the assertion would not apply unless that necessary condition is met. Please get back to us when you meet the above condition. In attempting to do so, you will realize why Eugene Hecht said that instantaneous power is "of limited utility". -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
WTD: Paul Harvey Rest of the Story broadcasts from Sep 1 thru 6 | Broadcasting |