On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:33:41 -0400, Chuck
wrote:

On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:07:26 -0700 (PDT), K7ITM wrote:

snip


Note that, as far as I've been able to determine, Michelson did not
have a coherent light source to shine into his interferometer, but
still he saw interference patterns. Perhaps he had invented lasers

snip


It is said he used sodium vapor gas light (~589 nm). Coherent enough.

Monochromatic is not the same as coherent or in phase such as a
laser.


Chuck

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com

Roger wrote:

Note that, as far as I've been able to determine, Michelson did not
have a coherent light source to shine into his interferometer, but
still he saw interference patterns. Perhaps he had invented lasers

It is said he used sodium vapor gas light (~589 nm). Coherent enough.

Monochromatic is not the same as coherent or in phase such as a
laser.

Just a slight addition here. Before lasers, the way to get a
coherent light source was to bottle-up a high-intensity,
monochromatic source, such as the aforementioned sodium-
vapor light, in a reflective cavity with a very small pinhole in
its side. As the photons dribble out through the pinhole, they
are forced into a somewhat phase-coherent wave train. This
source was used in optical processors for synthetic-aperture
radar imagery back in the 50's....

Jim, K7JEB