Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 1, 12:06*am, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote: We are talking about the same circuit, which you now claim exhibits interference, rendering your hypothesis moot. If the average interference is zero, the average reflected power is dissipated in the source resistor. All of your unethical lies, innuendo, and hand-waving will not change that fact of physics. More precisely, the average value of the imputed reflected power is numerically equal to the increase in the average power dissipated in the source resistor. It is not obvious why you reject this more precise, less misleading description. Is there an intent to mislead the reader? ...Keith |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
WTD: Paul Harvey Rest of the Story broadcasts from Sep 1 thru 6 | Broadcasting |