Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
So I've spent months, rather years, carefully designing a new 5 band cubical quad for myself. I've always known that I would use #12 solid copper wire (not stranded), so that is what I used when running NEC2 to optimize this touchy antenna design (over millions of iterations). Well, real world things are starting to happen. For wire, I've decided what I would like to use is an enameled coated copperweld wire. I'll buy the plain copperweld wire and coat it myself. So my question is, what is the most accurate way to make sure when I build the quad that I account for the velocity factor (unknown) of the wire I use? Should I grid dip the elements and make sure they agree with my NEC2 model? Can I build a simple loop on a higher frequency with the wire and then somehow use that information to rescale my wire lengths? What is the "right" way to do this? I wonder how consistent velocity factor will be if I do my own coating on the wire....maybe hand coating is a bad idea for this reason.... I spent a lot of time designing a Yagi with NEC2. I used Leeson's correction for taper elements and to calculate the effect of the element to boom mounts. All that attention paid off - I thought my Yagi lived up to the NEC2 predictions very well. -Scott, WU2X |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
VU4 log accuracy... | Dx | |||
What is the max power (dBm) a AM receiver can get in the real world? | Broadcasting | |||
IN THE REAL WORLD ANTI GIRLS CAN DO NOTHING TO STOP THIS... | CB | |||
Bode plots in the real world | Homebrew | |||
ARRL on real world BPL tests - devastating effect on the HF bands | Policy |