LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3   Report Post  
Old March 24th 08, 09:02 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 797
Default 160m vertical


"rb" wrote in message
news
Got about 60' for a vertical. Using 160'm, any length close to this
better for 160 (up or down)? Idea is to bottom feed it with an antenna
tuner. Yes, radials will be run. Also, will top loading help or hurt?




add a top hat to it to help make it more efficient, that will definately
help. base loading or tuner will be needed to make most radios happy with
it, if you are going to use a tuner and the coax run isn't extremely long i
wouldn't bother with base loading... unless you want to run high power where
the swr on the cable may damage it, or your tuner just can't handle the
mismatch.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
160m John Doe Equipment 1 September 2nd 07 02:39 PM
160m John Doe Swap 1 August 26th 07 06:10 PM
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] RHF Shortwave 0 December 27th 05 06:03 PM
PSK on 160m from 9V Bob 9V1GO Digital 0 January 6th 04 12:49 PM
PSK on 160m from 9V Bob 9V1GO Digital 0 January 6th 04 12:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017