Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 12th 08, 06:54 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
JN JN is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 21
Default Linear decoupling traps

I am planning a two band antenna for 30 and 80m using linear traps.
The idea is to build the antenna of zip-cord type line 140ohm vf 0.73.
Trap is made using 1/4 wave shorted stub, decoupling occurs at the open end.
My question:
Is there any difference if the shorted end is pointing to the center or to
the tip of dipole.
Only the stub portion has two wires in parallell, the rest is only one wire.

----------------------------------------xxcenterxxx----
I_________

OR

----------------------------------------xxxxcenterxxx------
________I


73 Jouko OH5RM





  #2   Report Post  
Old April 14th 08, 02:45 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7
Default Linear decoupling traps

On Apr 12, 11:54*am, "JN" wrote:
I am planning a two band antenna for 30 and 80m using linear traps.
73 Jouko OH5RM


Jouko.......you might try to GOOGLE:

"lattin antenna"

That may lead you to useful information.

Lee KA0FPJ














  #3   Report Post  
Old April 15th 08, 09:39 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
JN JN is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 21
Default Linear decoupling traps



Jouko.......you might try to GOOGLE:

"lattin antenna"

That may lead you to useful information.

Lee KA0FPJ


Yes Lee, Google found quite a lot of hits, but they all refer to one 5band
antenna design with no much
real information. So my question still remains open. Could some modelling
program give the answer?
I think those two alternatives differ at least in how much inductive loadind
they are causing to the lower frequency
and so shortening the total length of antenna.

Jouko OH5RM













  #4   Report Post  
Old April 15th 08, 05:30 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default Linear decoupling traps

On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:39:04 +0300, "JN" wrote:



Jouko.......you might try to GOOGLE:

"lattin antenna"

That may lead you to useful information.

Yes Lee, Google found quite a lot of hits, but they all refer to one 5band
antenna design with no much
real information. So my question still remains open. Could some modelling
program give the answer?
I think those two alternatives differ at least in how much inductive loadind
they are causing to the lower frequency
and so shortening the total length of antenna.


Hi Jouko OH5RM

Yes modeling can give an answer:
NO

It does not work.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #5   Report Post  
Old April 15th 08, 05:48 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
JN JN is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 21
Default Linear decoupling traps

Hi Jouko OH5RM

Yes modeling can give an answer:
NO

It does not work.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


Hi Richard,

Sorry I didnt quite understand your short answer.
What does not work? The whole principe of decoupling stubs?
Unfortenately I myself have no modelling program.

73 Jouko OH5RM




  #6   Report Post  
Old April 15th 08, 06:30 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default Linear decoupling traps

On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:48:53 +0300, "JN" wrote:

Hi Jouko OH5RM

Yes modeling can give an answer:
NO

It does not work.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


Hi Richard,

Sorry I didnt quite understand your short answer.
What does not work? The whole principe of decoupling stubs?
Unfortenately I myself have no modelling program.


Hi Jouko,

Basically, what you describe was discussed here last week as the W9INN
dipole, and recently as the Lattin dipole. Being the same thing as
your twin line (parallel line, or folded stub, or whatever); the
premise is these elements resonate and thus trap an antenna for
multiband operation. Those stubs are not oriented correctly.

Let's take this by degrees. Any dipole is a multiband antenna. Those
bands might be useful, and they might not. The point is that being
multiband is nothing remarkable in itself. What is remarkable is if
that antenna is useful in every band you want to use it in. This is
the "Holy Grail." Nearly 60 years ago, a Ham invented the Lattin
antenna. We cannot say it was designed because it never performed
according to claims (and I do mean NEVER). It was even patented.

Designs do work, inventions rarely do. We get inventors here every
week, some hang around for years. The bottom line is that if these
inventions worked, we would be using them (and that is 2% of the goal
of these inventors, the other 98% is seeking validation as being
eminent thinkers). The Lattin antenna's balance sheet shows 1PPM
usage, and no pursuit of validation (the inventor is dead, but some
still keep the vigil and change the flowers at Internet memorial
sites).

You can try your hand at modeling by visiting:
http://www.eznec.com/
The Lattin design is easily constructed by a model, I've done several
dozen variations. You can also model stubs that are oriented
correctly and that will work.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #7   Report Post  
Old April 16th 08, 07:21 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
JN JN is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 21
Default Linear decoupling traps

..

----------------------------------------xxcenterxxx----
I_________

OR

----------------------------------------xxxxcenterxxx------
________I


73 Jouko OH5RM


Different text sizes seem to destroy the graphics, I used the medium size in
Outlook express.
Anyway the upper is OK , the lower should look like this

______________________________________/center/_____
___________I

OH5RM


  #8   Report Post  
Old April 16th 08, 12:59 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 118
Default Linear decoupling traps

On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:21:13 +0300, "JN" wrote:

.

----------------------------------------xxcenterxxx----
I_________

OR

----------------------------------------xxxxcenterxxx------
________I


73 Jouko OH5RM


Different text sizes seem to destroy the graphics, I used the medium size in
Outlook express.
Anyway the upper is OK , the lower should look like this

______________________________________/center/_____
___________I

OH5RM


from OP
My question:
Is there any difference if the shorted end is pointing to the center or to
the tip of dipole.
Only the stub portion has two wires in parallell, the rest is only one wire.


Jouko, I noticed this thread took a detour, but I never saw anyone
actually try to answer your question. I too, am looking to see the
answer on this.

It is amazing, all this talk about a Lattin antenna, that appears to
have lots of sites talking about how it works, but no one actually
having built one or used one, and a simple "yes" or "no" would answer
your question.

I don't have the answers or the means of testing one at this time. If
you get the answer direct, please post it here.

Thanks
Buck
N4PGW
--
73 for now
Buck, N4PGW

www.lumpuckeroo.com

"Small - broadband - efficient: pick any two."
  #9   Report Post  
Old April 16th 08, 03:01 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
JN JN is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 21
Default Linear decoupling traps

Jouko, I noticed this thread took a detour, but I never saw anyone
actually try to answer your question. I too, am looking to see the
answer on this.

73 for now
Buck, N4PGW

www.lumpuckeroo.com


Yes Buck it is often difficult to get an answer just to the question you are
asking.
Anyway very soon all snow has melted away here and then its possible to
testbuild it.

73 Jouko OH5RM


  #10   Report Post  
Old April 16th 08, 03:30 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2007
Posts: 25
Default Linear decoupling traps


"JN" wrote in message
...
Jouko, I noticed this thread took a detour, but I never saw anyone
actually try to answer your question. I too, am looking to see the
answer on this.

73 for now
Buck, N4PGW

www.lumpuckeroo.com


Yes Buck it is often difficult to get an answer just to the question you
are asking.
Anyway very soon all snow has melted away here and then its possible to
testbuild it.

73 Jouko OH5RM


Hi Jouko

I thought Richard's statement that modeling would tell you about how the
design might perform, was good advice. If you use EZNEC, I'd be willing to
help you if you dont already know how to use it to model your antenna.

Jerry KD6JDJ




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Effectiveness of decoupling radials Owen Duffy Antenna 14 May 2nd 07 10:22 PM
Capacitor Traps [email protected] Shortwave 0 January 15th 06 07:47 PM
Decoupling coax transmission line Charlie Antenna 3 December 31st 04 04:27 PM
WTB : Beam Traps NA1VT Homebrew 0 October 16th 04 03:14 PM
WTB : Beam Traps NA1VT General 0 October 16th 04 03:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017