Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am planning a two band antenna for 30 and 80m using linear traps.
The idea is to build the antenna of zip-cord type line 140ohm vf 0.73. Trap is made using 1/4 wave shorted stub, decoupling occurs at the open end. My question: Is there any difference if the shorted end is pointing to the center or to the tip of dipole. Only the stub portion has two wires in parallell, the rest is only one wire. ----------------------------------------xxcenterxxx---- I_________ OR ----------------------------------------xxxxcenterxxx------ ________I 73 Jouko OH5RM |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 11:54*am, "JN" wrote:
I am planning a two band antenna for 30 and 80m using linear traps. 73 Jouko OH5RM Jouko.......you might try to GOOGLE: "lattin antenna" That may lead you to useful information. Lee KA0FPJ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Jouko.......you might try to GOOGLE: "lattin antenna" That may lead you to useful information. Lee KA0FPJ Yes Lee, Google found quite a lot of hits, but they all refer to one 5band antenna design with no much real information. So my question still remains open. Could some modelling program give the answer? I think those two alternatives differ at least in how much inductive loadind they are causing to the lower frequency and so shortening the total length of antenna. Jouko OH5RM |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:39:04 +0300, "JN" wrote:
Jouko.......you might try to GOOGLE: "lattin antenna" That may lead you to useful information. Yes Lee, Google found quite a lot of hits, but they all refer to one 5band antenna design with no much real information. So my question still remains open. Could some modelling program give the answer? I think those two alternatives differ at least in how much inductive loadind they are causing to the lower frequency and so shortening the total length of antenna. Hi Jouko OH5RM Yes modeling can give an answer: NO It does not work. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Jouko OH5RM
Yes modeling can give an answer: NO It does not work. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Hi Richard, Sorry I didnt quite understand your short answer. What does not work? The whole principe of decoupling stubs? Unfortenately I myself have no modelling program. 73 Jouko OH5RM |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:48:53 +0300, "JN" wrote:
Hi Jouko OH5RM Yes modeling can give an answer: NO It does not work. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Hi Richard, Sorry I didnt quite understand your short answer. What does not work? The whole principe of decoupling stubs? Unfortenately I myself have no modelling program. Hi Jouko, Basically, what you describe was discussed here last week as the W9INN dipole, and recently as the Lattin dipole. Being the same thing as your twin line (parallel line, or folded stub, or whatever); the premise is these elements resonate and thus trap an antenna for multiband operation. Those stubs are not oriented correctly. Let's take this by degrees. Any dipole is a multiband antenna. Those bands might be useful, and they might not. The point is that being multiband is nothing remarkable in itself. What is remarkable is if that antenna is useful in every band you want to use it in. This is the "Holy Grail." Nearly 60 years ago, a Ham invented the Lattin antenna. We cannot say it was designed because it never performed according to claims (and I do mean NEVER). It was even patented. Designs do work, inventions rarely do. We get inventors here every week, some hang around for years. The bottom line is that if these inventions worked, we would be using them (and that is 2% of the goal of these inventors, the other 98% is seeking validation as being eminent thinkers). The Lattin antenna's balance sheet shows 1PPM usage, and no pursuit of validation (the inventor is dead, but some still keep the vigil and change the flowers at Internet memorial sites). You can try your hand at modeling by visiting: http://www.eznec.com/ The Lattin design is easily constructed by a model, I've done several dozen variations. You can also model stubs that are oriented correctly and that will work. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
..
----------------------------------------xxcenterxxx---- I_________ OR ----------------------------------------xxxxcenterxxx------ ________I 73 Jouko OH5RM Different text sizes seem to destroy the graphics, I used the medium size in Outlook express. Anyway the upper is OK , the lower should look like this ______________________________________/center/_____ ___________I OH5RM |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:21:13 +0300, "JN" wrote:
. ----------------------------------------xxcenterxxx---- I_________ OR ----------------------------------------xxxxcenterxxx------ ________I 73 Jouko OH5RM Different text sizes seem to destroy the graphics, I used the medium size in Outlook express. Anyway the upper is OK , the lower should look like this ______________________________________/center/_____ ___________I OH5RM from OP My question: Is there any difference if the shorted end is pointing to the center or to the tip of dipole. Only the stub portion has two wires in parallell, the rest is only one wire. Jouko, I noticed this thread took a detour, but I never saw anyone actually try to answer your question. I too, am looking to see the answer on this. It is amazing, all this talk about a Lattin antenna, that appears to have lots of sites talking about how it works, but no one actually having built one or used one, and a simple "yes" or "no" would answer your question. I don't have the answers or the means of testing one at this time. If you get the answer direct, please post it here. Thanks Buck N4PGW -- 73 for now Buck, N4PGW www.lumpuckeroo.com "Small - broadband - efficient: pick any two." |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jouko, I noticed this thread took a detour, but I never saw anyone
actually try to answer your question. I too, am looking to see the answer on this. 73 for now Buck, N4PGW www.lumpuckeroo.com Yes Buck it is often difficult to get an answer just to the question you are asking. Anyway very soon all snow has melted away here and then its possible to testbuild it. 73 Jouko OH5RM |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "JN" wrote in message ... Jouko, I noticed this thread took a detour, but I never saw anyone actually try to answer your question. I too, am looking to see the answer on this. 73 for now Buck, N4PGW www.lumpuckeroo.com Yes Buck it is often difficult to get an answer just to the question you are asking. Anyway very soon all snow has melted away here and then its possible to testbuild it. 73 Jouko OH5RM Hi Jouko I thought Richard's statement that modeling would tell you about how the design might perform, was good advice. If you use EZNEC, I'd be willing to help you if you dont already know how to use it to model your antenna. Jerry KD6JDJ |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Effectiveness of decoupling radials | Antenna | |||
Capacitor Traps | Shortwave | |||
Decoupling coax transmission line | Antenna | |||
WTB : Beam Traps | Homebrew | |||
WTB : Beam Traps | General |