Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Apr 2008 21:35:28 GMT, "Ed_G"
wrote: In my case, I am considering the use of a vertical at a new residence built on sand. Since I am not concerned about low angle radiation characteristics, the Half Wave may be something to consider..... giving me a fairly efficient vertical operation with some NVIS characteristics. Hi Ed, Efficient? A vertical has almost no Near Vertical radiation for Near Vertical Incidence Skywave. You can get along with "almost no," or you can simply use a low horizontal which would exhibit "a lot of" Near Vertical Incidence Skywave. Good ground, bad ground, radials, no radials won't change efficiency much for the vertical's incidence overhead (there's a hole in that pattern). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Vertical above the ground-plane | Antenna | |||
Effect of raising vertical antenna higher | Antenna | |||
Proximity effect of 2 different vertical antennas | Antenna | |||
effect of metal pipe supporting a vertical cage antenna | Antenna | |||
Ground system for a vertical antenna | Antenna |