Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 20th 08, 09:10 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Feb 2008
Posts: 53
Default Why is my dipole low impedance?

Roy Lewallen wrote:
What do you read when you connect a
47 - 75 ohm resistor across the
terminals of your measuring device?


Plain resistors read appropriately.
27ohms, 56 ohms etc.

I don't have a good dummy load. I have a 50 ohm
50w resistor but it's wire wound. It varies all
over the range when I sweep the MFJ.

Known good piece of coax, end shorted or open,
reads 50 ohms when the MFJ is tuned to the quarter
wave of the coax.

MFJ seems to read a vertical hamstick
appropriately -

http://digitalcartography.com/n0eq/M...il-600x400.jpg

I just made a contact on 5W QRP from Phoenix (here)
to St Louis. So I have to guess the antenna isn't
open or shorted or something else catastrophic.
That's through an LDG tuner.

But -

Running the dipole into my Yaesu 857 with external
tuner bypassed, shows an SWR high enough to cause
the transciever to self protect shut down.

Engage the tuner, SWR comes down to 1.5:1, and
I'm putting out (at least to the back of the radio)
very close to the selected 5 watts.

Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke

www.n0eq.com





  #2   Report Post  
Old May 20th 08, 09:47 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,374
Default Why is my dipole low impedance?

Lumpy wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote:
What do you read when you connect a
47 - 75 ohm resistor across the
terminals of your measuring device?


Plain resistors read appropriately.
27ohms, 56 ohms etc.

I don't have a good dummy load. I have a 50 ohm
50w resistor but it's wire wound. It varies all
over the range when I sweep the MFJ.

Known good piece of coax, end shorted or open,
reads 50 ohms when the MFJ is tuned to the quarter
wave of the coax.
. . .


Something's seriously wrong there. A shorted quarter wavelength of coax
should read very high impedance when the far end is shorted and very low
when the far end is open. The only time it should read 50 ohms with the
far end shorted or open is if it has many dB of loss. And no even half
decent coax should have anywhere near that much loss in a quarter
wavelength.

So it appears that either your coax is extremely lossy for some reason
(and I can't think of any mechanism which would cause that much loss
unless the coax is specifically designed to be very lossy for some
special reason) or the meter is oscillating or otherwise misbehaving
when connected to coax.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL
  #3   Report Post  
Old May 20th 08, 10:30 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Feb 2008
Posts: 53
Default Why is my dipole low impedance?

Roy Lewallen wrote:
Something's seriously wrong there. A shorted quarter wavelength of
coax should read very high impedance when the far end is shorted and
very low when the far end is open. The only time it should read 50
ohms with the far end shorted or open is if it has many dB of loss.
And no even half decent coax should have anywhere near that much loss
in a quarter wavelength.


Maybe I'm not testing correctly.
100' length of new coax. Tests ok for no shorts or open.

MFJ set to 2.4MHz gives me a Z (on the advanced
menu) of 50 ohms with distal end of the coax
either open or shorted. Actually shorting the
end with a screwdriver shaft drops the Z from
50 to 49. I assume 1 ohm is within normal limits.

Same settings gives me an R (on the main menu)
of zero ohms either open or shorted.

I get exactly the same results on several
pieces of coax, old/new, RG8 or 58. Resistance
is zero, impedance is 50, shorted or open at
the resonant quarter freq.

Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke

www.n0eq.com



  #4   Report Post  
Old May 21st 08, 12:46 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Feb 2008
Posts: 53
Default Why is my dipole low impedance?

Thanks for everyone's comments
and questions. Based on what
several suggest, I think the MFJ
analyzer is B/O. I'm still making
contacts like crazy, even if the
meter says I shouldn't be.

I think I'll get the 259 back to
MFJ while it's still under warranty.

Thanks again -


Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke

www.n0eq.com


  #5   Report Post  
Old May 21st 08, 06:11 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,374
Default Why is my dipole low impedance?

Lumpy wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote:
Something's seriously wrong there. A shorted quarter wavelength of
coax should read very high impedance when the far end is shorted and
very low when the far end is open. The only time it should read 50
ohms with the far end shorted or open is if it has many dB of loss.
And no even half decent coax should have anywhere near that much loss
in a quarter wavelength.


Maybe I'm not testing correctly.
100' length of new coax. Tests ok for no shorts or open.

MFJ set to 2.4MHz gives me a Z (on the advanced
menu) of 50 ohms with distal end of the coax
either open or shorted. Actually shorting the
end with a screwdriver shaft drops the Z from
50 to 49. I assume 1 ohm is within normal limits.

Same settings gives me an R (on the main menu)
of zero ohms either open or shorted.

I get exactly the same results on several
pieces of coax, old/new, RG8 or 58. Resistance
is zero, impedance is 50, shorted or open at
the resonant quarter freq.

Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke

www.n0eq.com


At 2.4 MHz, the line is pretty close to 3/8 wavelength, not 1/4 --
assuming it has solid and not foamed dielectric. At that length with the
other end shorted or open, the impedance would be very nearly 50 ohms,
all reactive, which means the resistance would be zero as you're seeing.
So those measurements are correct. Your meter is showing the correct
values when measuring resistors (purely resistive) and the shorted/open
coax (purely reactive), so there's nothing obviously wrong with the meter.

The remaining possibility for your problem with the antenna is external
RF, as someone else mentioned earlier. I find it nearly impossible to
use my 259B for antenna measurements at my QTH because of strong AM, FM,
and TV signals -- ironically, the "antenna analyzer" is great for a lot
of other chores, but not for actually analyzing antennas. It's pretty
likely that's what your problem is too. When measuring antennas, I have
to use filters which introduce minimal impedance disturbances at the
measurement frequency while providing attenuation of the offending signals.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How much can the impedance of coax vary from its characteristic impedance? [email protected] Antenna 23 August 21st 07 09:12 PM
impedance kretko Antenna 5 June 11th 06 08:08 AM
impedance kretko Antenna 1 June 9th 06 04:30 PM
Insulation diameter vs Impedance OR how to get 20dBi out of a short Dipole Richard Clark Antenna 20 May 17th 06 12:37 AM
A: What is impedance (Z) Steve Nosko Antenna 121 March 2nd 04 05:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017