|
Unwin antennas
Thought I would drop in and provide an update on the above.
The patent request has not emerged by being published as per the norm as I am my own attorney thus normal PTO protocol has not been followed as they are assisting me as per requirements by law. Regarding the antenna sent to Michigan for testing per a request on this newsgroup and receipt acknoweledged on this newsgroup. Since that day therei has been no communication from him. With him being in the business of antennas that has really surprised me but again many cruel jokes came about with respect to that antenna. Now the acedemic semesters have come to an end I am expecting the professor who has volunteered to supply and publish a paper on my work should start to pick up again. Papers have to follow a proper protical with mathematics and the professor has written many papers. As President of the IEEE group on Antennas and Propagation she will begiving several talks at the International show in a few weeks at San Diego after which things should get up to speed. I will put up a page later today that will be intended more for the lay man and without all the mathematical details that a true physics paper requires for submission. The page will be titled Unwin antennas or something like that for those who wish to read it. I am not coming back to the group to discuss it or accepting E mails because of passed experience, but some on this group did supply interesting comments over the years and it is for them this post is adressesd to. I'm gone and no. the door did not hit my arse as I left the scene quite a while ago Art Unwin KB9MZ.......XG |
Unwin antennas
Art Unwin wrote:
.. I will put up a page later today that will be intended more for the lay man and without all the mathematical details that a true physics paper requires for submission. ... Art Unwin KB9MZ.......XG Will be looking forward to giving that paper a glance, keep me posted .... thanks Art. Regards, JS |
Unwin antennas
On Jun 6, 3:14 pm, John Smith wrote:
Art Unwin wrote: .. I will put up a page later today that will be intended more for the lay man and without all the mathematical details that a true physics paper requires for submission. ... Art Unwin KB9MZ.......XG Will be looking forward to giving that paper a glance, keep me posted ... thanks Art. Regards, JS John, I am new to this stuff. It takes a couple of weeks for the search engines to pick it up. In the mean time I have been told that htt://unwinantennas.com/ will pick it up. Don't know what else I can do as I haven't tried it for myself yet Have fun Art |
Unwin antennas
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:26:34 -0400, Christopher Cox
wrote: Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino Re-write this: http://unwinantennas.com/ That unwin page is full utter nonsense. Absolute crackpottery. w. |
Unwin antennas
Art Unwin wrote:
... htt://unwinantennas.com/ will pick it up. Don't know what else I can do as I haven't tried it for myself yet Have fun Art Works for me! Well, once I added the missing "p" in http ... or: http://unwinantennas.com/ Thanks Art. Warm regards, JS |
Unwin antennas
Christopher Cox wrote:
Works for me! Well, once I added the missing "p" in http ... or: Judging from this response, I assume you think I have a problem with the link. I do not. I do have a problem with several sentences in the web page. I recently ... Uh, no ... But, you do give yourself away with your text and its' direction. Your problem is a very simple one; you see yourself as the center of importance and my focus in any exchange of text you and I have had. Rest assured, you are in error--at least where it involves myself. Most often, I say what I mean and mean what I say. Your tea leaves, crystal balls and examinations of my text are likely only lead you to draw more erroneous conclusions, and are likely to lead you further astray of my meanings and intentions--given your mindset ... Or, in summary, if you desire a childish conflict, search for those of a like mind and purpose. Regards, JS |
Unwin antennas
Christopher Cox wrote:
... Ok, you are right. What did you mean by the phrase "Works for me" so that I can be corrected. Thanks for all your help. Chris Really? That is the problem? Huh, never would have seen that one coming! OK, let me expand and give greater detail on "the meaning" of those words, by example--at least where they involve myself. 1) Say a host offers me a Jim Beam on ice at a social event--I have replied, "That works for me!" (my favorite drink is a Vodka Collins!) 2) A kludge is thrown together to patch a nasty little glitch in a computer program (a real fix will be done later), I have replied, "Works for me!" 3) Someone offers me a website which provides the data/information I have requested, they have made a slight error which I wish to, and mostly overlook--so, playing down the importance of such, I reply, "Works for me ..." 4) The wife purchases a new "nightie", I have been known to reply, on occasion, "THAT WORKS FOR ME!" EVIL GRIN 5) etc ... Again, I feel you are too focused on your "perceived importance" or else my desire for conflict, I assure you, I am unhindered by such. Perhaps and far too often, one is given to find what one searches for. Let's control the direction of these endeavors. And, in such light, I am pleased you asked for clarification, so my intents would become known to you--hopefully, you will accept my stated intent. Regards, JS |
Unwin antennas
On Jun 9, 10:50 am, Helmut Wabnig hwabnig@ .- --- -. dotat wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:26:34 -0400, Christopher Cox wrote: Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino Re-write this: http://unwinantennas.com/ That unwin page is full utter nonsense. Absolute crackpottery. w. That pottery is so cracked, even epoxy wouldn't help put Unwin Dumpty back together again.. :/ |
Unwin antennas
great one art! a work of absolute unabashed fiction.. i wonder how many
will bite??? I needed something to make me laugh, and that definately filled the bill tonight! "Art Unwin" wrote in message ... On Jun 6, 3:14 pm, John Smith wrote: Art Unwin wrote: .. I will put up a page later today that will be intended more for the lay man and without all the mathematical details that a true physics paper requires for submission. ... Art Unwin KB9MZ.......XG Will be looking forward to giving that paper a glance, keep me posted ... thanks Art. Regards, JS John, I am new to this stuff. It takes a couple of weeks for the search engines to pick it up. In the mean time I have been told that htt://unwinantennas.com/ will pick it up. Don't know what else I can do as I haven't tried it for myself yet Have fun Art |
Unwin antennas
Christopher Cox wrote:
... As always, you are free to carry on ... Regards, JS |
Unwin antennas
In message , Helmut Wabnig
writes On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:26:34 -0400, Christopher Cox wrote: Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino Re-write this: http://unwinantennas.com/ That unwin page is full utter nonsense. Absolute crackpottery. Deep joy, megacyclymolds folloloping out of the endybits. B -- Brian Howie |
Unwin antennas
On Jun 10, 1:14 am, Brian Howie wrote:
In message , Helmut Wabnig writes On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:26:34 -0400, Christopher Cox wrote: Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino Re-write this: http://unwinantennas.com/ That unwin page is full utter nonsense. Absolute crackpottery. Deep joy, megacyclymolds folloloping out of the endybits. B -- Brian Howie Sayeth Art, 2. All dynamic particles have a degree of torque or spin which aids directional movement within the universe. The universe is a big rifle.. I wonder what the rate of twist is.... :/ Static particles has a less spin which allows a scattering of movement after ejection from the sun’s arbitrary field to various parts of the universe and beyond, included what is known as the milky way constellation. How can a static particle move, much less have spin? I'm confused.. I guess it's because I don't have the vast education that Art had in some past life. I say past life, because judging from most I read, he must have forgotten everything he learned.. Either that or he just wants to be different and proclaims all prior art as something to be ignored. I do agree to his statement as to the existence of the Milky Way. But... even a redneck dummy like me knows it's a galaxy, not a constellation. I guess his astronomy learnin was in a past life also... I like to look at it, but I can only see it well when I'm out in the sticks. You generally can't see the Milky Way in the city limits of Houston. Too much light pollution. But lets ponder a "static" particle that decided to propel itself across the great lawn of outer space all the way to the Milky Way. I wonder what will happen when these "static" particles that decided to move, clash with the like particles being ejected by all the zillions of stars in the Milky Way galaxy. Will they collide with a mighty flash of light? Will they taunt each other to fight? Would they combine to form "Unwin particles" which begin to twist in a opposite direction? Maybe we could name these "Articles" in Art's honor. Well, in Art's case, I'm sure he would prefer honour. I think that would be the UK version. Makes my head swim considering all the possibilities of this "New Science"... |
Unwin antennas
On Jun 10, 1:14 am, Brian Howie wrote:
In message , Helmut Wabnig writes On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:26:34 -0400, Christopher Cox wrote: Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino Re-write this: http://unwinantennas.com/ That unwin page is full utter nonsense. Absolute crackpottery. Deep joy, megacyclymolds folloloping out of the endybits. B -- Brian Howie So sayeth Art... The millions of particles after ejection travel in a straight line with zero gravitation effects on its movements all of which are following each other in a particular sequence that is reflective of the oscillations applied to the radiator, bouncing off of the arbitrary outer surfaces of the earth until they impact and rest on a diamagnetic surface’ which by virtue of its mechanical properties accepts the arrival of the airborne particles in the same progression that they left the radiator such that a mirror image of oscillations from the sending antenna is imparted to the receiving antenna to complete the communication process. How will these millions of particles travel in a straight line? In another paragraph you said they had a twist? I'm confused. Enlighten me, Obe-wan Kenobe. You're our only hope. I wonder about the resting of these particles on surfaces of virtuous mechanical properties. What happened to them? All tuckered out? Decided to stop for gas and some choke and puke food? Or maybe they were enticed by some hottie female particle that danced seductively along this surface of virtuous mechanical properties? The rest kind of reminds me of looking at a picture of a picture in a picture in a picture, etc ad nausium. Fascinating this new science is. |
Unwin antennas
On Jun 10, 1:14 am, Brian Howie wrote:
In message , Helmut Wabnig writes On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:26:34 -0400, Christopher Cox wrote: Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino Re-write this: http://unwinantennas.com/ That unwin page is full utter nonsense. Absolute crackpottery. Deep joy, megacyclymolds folloloping out of the endybits. B -- Brian Howie So sayeth Art.. Of course with modern day computer programs of the optimizer form if we move away from standard physics and not predetermine a planar form, the computer program which is based on Maxwell’s laws will include the anti gravitational field(4) which as predicted by applying an extension to Gaussian law will show radiators where the majority are resonant such that the array in it’s entirety is in equilibrium and certainly not parallel to the earth’s surface! What other physics would you suggest? Substandard physics? |
Unwin antennas
On Jun 10, 1:14 am, Brian Howie wrote:
In message , Helmut Wabnig writes On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:26:34 -0400, Christopher Cox wrote: Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino Re-write this: http://unwinantennas.com/ That unwin page is full utter nonsense. Absolute crackpottery. Deep joy, megacyclymolds folloloping out of the endybits. B -- Brian Howie So sayeth Art.. We can now state that: A RADIATOR CAN BE ANY SIZE, SHAPE OR VARYING ELEVATIONS AS LONG AS IT IS IN A STATE OF EQUILIBRIUM. What will be the efficiency of a 1 inch long Unwin antenna that is used at 1.890 mhz? This may or may not be a trick question. |
Unwin antennas
On Jun 10, 1:14 am, Brian Howie wrote:
In message , Helmut Wabnig writes On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:26:34 -0400, Christopher Cox wrote: Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino Re-write this: http://unwinantennas.com/ That unwin page is full utter nonsense. Absolute crackpottery. Deep joy, megacyclymolds folloloping out of the endybits. B -- Brian Howie So sayeth Art... 7. Ground planes are a means of placing a fractional wavelength antenna into equilibrium form where the operating period includes other actions within the system but outside the confines of the radiator itself. I'm impressed. That just craps all over everything I ever learned about ground planes. Art, you *are* truly gifted. I nominate you as the cover boy of QST for the April 09 edition. |
Unwin antennas
On Jun 10, 1:14 am, Brian Howie wrote:
In message , Helmut Wabnig writes On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:26:34 -0400, Christopher Cox wrote: Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino Re-write this: http://unwinantennas.com/ That unwin page is full utter nonsense. Absolute crackpottery. Deep joy, megacyclymolds folloloping out of the endybits. B -- Brian Howie So sayeth Art. 3. The connection between Gauss’s law and Maxwell’s law is not readily apparent since one law is formulated with the metrics of SI whereas the other is formulated in CGS units. I admit it. My cat has mittens. |
Unwin antennas
On Jun 10, 1:14 am, Brian Howie wrote:
In message , Helmut Wabnig writes On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:26:34 -0400, Christopher Cox wrote: Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino Re-write this: http://unwinantennas.com/ That unwin page is full utter nonsense. Absolute crackpottery. Deep joy, megacyclymolds folloloping out of the endybits. B -- Brian Howie So sayeth Art.. Patent applied for All rights reserved Rev 0 June 2008 You patent a web page of jibber jabber? Ok, I admit you have the right to post a web page of jibber jabber. I also acknowledge your right to decide this jibber jabber is incorrect, and to revise it to suit the wind direction at the moment of revision. Yes, it is June 2008. The grass is green this time of year. Well unless you happen to live down under.. |
Unwin antennas
On Jun 10, 1:14 am, Brian Howie wrote:
In message , Helmut Wabnig writes On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:26:34 -0400, Christopher Cox wrote: Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino Re-write this: http://unwinantennas.com/ That unwin page is full utter nonsense. Absolute crackpottery. Deep joy, megacyclymolds folloloping out of the endybits. B -- Brian Howie So sayeth Art.. Note. A fractional wavelength antenna is NOT in equilibrium so the above do not apply. Thus the question surfaces regarding a electrical field now being present in the center of a fractional wave length antenna! That paragraph got you excited huh? I note the !... Hummmm thinketh I.. |
Unwin antennas
On Jun 10, 1:14 am, Brian Howie wrote:
In message , Helmut Wabnig writes On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:26:34 -0400, Christopher Cox wrote: Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino Re-write this: http://unwinantennas.com/ That unwin page is full utter nonsense. Absolute crackpottery. Deep joy, megacyclymolds folloloping out of the endybits. B -- Brian Howie So sayeth Art... (one of many methods of dampening including the addition of a resister) Shame on the mess! |
Unwin antennas
On Jun 10, 1:14 am, Brian Howie wrote:
In message , Helmut Wabnig writes On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:26:34 -0400, Christopher Cox wrote: Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino Re-write this: http://unwinantennas.com/ That unwin page is full utter nonsense. Absolute crackpottery. Deep joy, megacyclymolds folloloping out of the endybits. B -- Brian Howie So sayeth Art.. Remember that on our radiators the surface is completely covered by particles that started out as neutrinos Would those be fig neutrinos? All this new science talk is making me hungry... |
Unwin antennas
On Jun 10, 1:14 am, Brian Howie wrote:
In message , Helmut Wabnig writes On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:26:34 -0400, Christopher Cox wrote: Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino Re-write this: http://unwinantennas.com/ That unwin page is full utter nonsense. Absolute crackpottery. Deep joy, megacyclymolds folloloping out of the endybits. B -- Brian Howie So sayeth Art... However, all is not lost since the tank circuit and the pendulum mechanism produce identical oscillations for a particular period. Whew! that's a relief.. Would this be kind of like a perpetual cuckoo clock? Or would this resemble the identical amounts of motion that the little dancing people do when it's O-clock? "Note" Many cheap cuckoo clocks only have a small bird that jumps out of the little door near the top. But some higher level cuckoo clocks have little dancing people that dance around in a perfect circle. Being as they are mechanically affixed to some kind of plate, I assume you could say these dancers are in a state of equilibrium.. This new science is making me hungry... I need a fig neutrino... |
Unwin antennas
On Jun 10, 1:14 am, Brian Howie wrote:
In message , Helmut Wabnig writes On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:26:34 -0400, Christopher Cox wrote: Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino Re-write this: http://unwinantennas.com/ That unwin page is full utter nonsense. Absolute crackpottery. Deep joy, megacyclymolds folloloping out of the endybits. B -- Brian Howie So sayeth Art... With reference to the now smaller radiators, the new definition for a radiator can now be achieved by two Meander type circuits on different levels and connected such that the combination is in equilibrium. You could patent that one as a Meanderlibrium antenna. I tried a fig neutrino.. Had no taste at all.. I've seen shoe boxes wrapped with 22 gauge wire with more flavor to them.. |
Unwin antennas
On Jun 10, 1:14 am, Brian Howie wrote:
In message , Helmut Wabnig writes On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:26:34 -0400, Christopher Cox wrote: Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino Re-write this: http://unwinantennas.com/ That unwin page is full utter nonsense. Absolute crackpottery. Deep joy, megacyclymolds folloloping out of the endybits. B -- Brian Howie So sayeth Art.. Derived oscillations for a 12 inch diameter close contra -wound helical antenna in equilibrium with a length of 12 inches Wire used is approximately 2 thousand feet of 19 a.w.g magnet wire and without the implementation of a variometer or a progression of jumpers to bring continuity to the SWR in the less than 3:1 level of impedance. Note. No tuner losses are encountered and the antenna in equilibrium is placed on top of a tower without the need for a ground plane where it follows the rules of a traveling wave antenna. I had thought it followed the rules of the average dummy load... But yea, who is worried about any puny amount of tuner loss when you got 2000 feet of 19 gauge wire loading in the program.. :/ Isn't new science wonderful! |
Unwin antennas
On Jun 10, 1:14 am, Brian Howie wrote:
In message , Helmut Wabnig writes On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:26:34 -0400, Christopher Cox wrote: Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino Re-write this: http://unwinantennas.com/ That unwin page is full utter nonsense. Absolute crackpottery. Deep joy, megacyclymolds folloloping out of the endybits. B -- Brian Howie So sayeth Art... 1. As the particles decay over time they are pushed into the surface of materials by the impact of succeeding arrival of particles up to a certain depth called ‘skin depth’. Kind of like stomping grapes to make wine! This new science can be intoxicating! |
Unwin antennas
Brian Howie wrote:
In message , Helmut Wabnig writes On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:26:34 -0400, Christopher Cox wrote: Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino Re-write this: http://unwinantennas.com/ That unwin page is full utter nonsense. Absolute crackpottery. Deep joy, megacyclymolds folloloping out of the endybits. B -- Brian Howie Dang, all that pondering of new science depleted my daily allotment of googlings. But I have other doors to this place... :/ Whew, besides all this new science pondering has me tuckered out.. I'm going to go outside and see if I can see the Milky Way. You all can take two aspirin and call me in the morning with any updates on this new technology I've been learnin myself. |
Unwin antennas
AI4QJ wrote:
... John, "As always" you are posting pure BS in your constant search to look for a petty argument in which your persona can then pose as one who prefers to take the high road. If you really prefer to take the high road, then do so; don't try to preach to everyone else that this is what YOU do, therefore the rest of us should do the same. Sorry "John" but the road you take is neither high nor low. Your persona, like your usenet id, is a mere abstraction which explains your fondness with Art's fantasy antennas As always, idiots are easy to find; and, especially those who wish to tell everyone else what they are, who they are and what they need to do. I suggest you focus on yourself; that is the only person you have power over ... Regards, JS |
Unwin antennas
Christopher Cox wrote:
... What I am saying is Thunderbird made it look like you were responding to my post with a "Works for me!", which you were not. Moving Thunderbird's settings from: View-Threads-Unread to View-Threads-All I was able to see you were actually responding to Art's post. That being said, my response was not out of hand, but I did wonder why the tone of your post was as such. Now I understand. Wow, a little dense here. Got you now. Thunderbird is my favorite newsreader. Thank you for making me aware of what was happening. Now I wonder if this has happened before and taken advantage of my ignorance? Well, at least I have a chance of watching out for this now! Sorry for any misunderstanding on my part. I just copy-the-mail mostly here; I believe you mentioned you tend to do the same also. New ideas, methods, designs, new construction methods, new ways of looking at old ideas, etc. are what I mainly search for in my personal interests; And, those who share some of their knowledge and use of smith charts, maths, etc. are always of interest to me. Too often threads are just a rehash of some tried-and-true antenna design and construction methods. While this is always of interest to newbies, and should be if not, I tend to skip over them (or, been there, done that, built it, etc.) However, I was collecting a lot of material on conventional antennas, matching circuits, SWR bridges, etc. and properly indexing it so someone asking a common question or seeking a common design could be referred there without reinventing some ancient conversation describing their constructions, workings, operation, etc.; But, some evil person broke in while I was on holiday and stole a lot of computer equipment here. Among the computer equipment stolen was the USB external hard drive containing the website I was constructing. I have just started the project all over ... A few individuals here have already done this, to some degree and have some material on baluns/ununs, antennas, etc. on a website and available for view. Warm regards, JS |
Unwin antennas
Dave, K8MN wrote:
"Wouldn`t you like to be a fly on the wall in the Patent Office?" My perception of Art`s latest is a dipole composed of elements consisting of 1/4-wavelengths in effect but constructed of helices of 1/2-wavelengths of wire. My 20th edition of "The ARRL Antenna Book" on page 16-13 says: "The general approach has been to use a coil made from heavy wire (#14 or larger) with length-to-diameter ratios as high as 21. British experimenters have reported good results with 8-foot overall lengths on the 1.8 and 3.5 MHz bands." Also, on page 78 of "All About Vertical Antennas" by William Orr, W6SAI and Stu Cowan: "In general, a half-wavelength of no. 14 formvar-coated wire is spirally wrapped around the form, with turn spacing approximately equal to the wire diameter. This amount of wire will approximate a quarter-wave resonance." The Unwin Antenna seems to be in Richard Clark`s phrase: "Prior Art". Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Unwin antennas
AI4QJ wrote:
"John Smith" wrote in message ... There is no need to become emotional, "John". Perhaps your mind has been slightly compromised by one too many injestions of lysergic acid diethylamide in your earlier years. Take a deep breath and tell yourself "People in rraa really like me. I am a good person. I am smart. People know that. And people really do laugh at the absurd nonsense that I write sometimes, even if I'm not quite sure 'why' I write it myself." Now what makes you believe it is a 'good thing' to focus on one's self? Surely you can see what happened to Art after he tried that and ended up with the MI5 postings. He then refocused into the academic realm and ended up designing neutrino antennas. His recovery has apparently not been quite as successful as your's. Sorry "John" but I think people should pass on your advice, even if it is free. Brother, I cite the above to the reason I now "bit bucket" you ... nuff said ... JS |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com