Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil,
8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) (You seemed to miss the single smiley on my previous message, so I though I would try a few more.) The "proof" of something when one does not have adequate information is often called "faith". More to the point, there are several possible answers. 1. Who cares? If you can't measure it and you can't adjust it, just forget about it. Lack of maximum power transfer is rarely fatal. 2. If you are operating an amateur radio station just twist the knobs on the tuner until the transmitter is happy. 3. If you are designing a system to be sent into space then analyze and test the heck out of it. 73, Gene W4SZ Cecil Moore wrote: Gene Fuller wrote: Are you suggesting that a steam engine is needed in addition to "obvious and elementary notions"? I didn't say anything about a steam engine, Gene. The question is: How do you prove a conjugate match exists through measurements when you are completely ignorant of the source impedance? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Complex Z0 [Corrected] | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna |