Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Platt" wrote in message ... I've built a VHF/UHF Log Periodic for monitoring. It works quite well, but I've been curious about one thing... Using an analyzer, I get a good SWR on the majority of the antenna (below 1.5), but there's some areas that are fairly high. Well above 3.0. Obviously this isn't crucial for just monitoring, but I use that as a guide as far as seeing how well the antenna is designed. The thing that I don't understand is that the SWR readings will change if the cable is moved. The cable comes off the front end of the boom, travels back to the middle, then comes off across a horizontal mast (the antenna is vertical) and down the vertical mast. All that part of the cable doesn't move... But if I pick up the cable on the ground and change the location a bit, the SWR will change quite a bit... Areas that before had a poor SWR now have a good one, and areas that were good change to poor. Why would this happen? Also, would using a longer cable possibly make the SWR better? Typically I have tested with a 20' RG8X cable. I also usually test with the antenna about 8' off the ground. Would it improve with better elevation off the ground as well? Hi Dave What type balun did you use? 'Tis a good question! If an antenna's measured SWR changes when the doax is moved, it tends to mean one of two things: either there's something physically loose which is causing an intermittent electrical connnection, or you have a significant amount of RF current flowing back down the outside of the coax, and the feedline is acting as part of the antenna. I suspect that your high-SWR points are at frequencies where the outside of the feedline is close to a multiple of 1/2 electrical wavelength, and appears as a relatively low RF impedance to ground. Changing the feedline position or length could shift the effect of this unwanted RF pathway and move the high-SWR frequencies around. It's also possible that your SWR meter isn't actually measuring what you think it's measuring. If there's a strong UHF/VHF signal being transmitted in your area, the feedline or antenna might be picking it up and it might be confusing your analyzer (MFJ analyzers are notoriously subject to confusion on the lower HF frequencies for this reason, and you might be having a similar problem at VHF/UHF). Using a good balun (with the correct impedance-transformation ratio) at the feedpoint may help matters, if you aren't doing this already. Equally likely to help would be adding some choking impedance to the feedline, in the form of one-or-a-few snap-on two-part ferrite "interference suppressor" chokes. I'd suggest installing one just below the point at which the feedline leaves the antenna boom. I suspect that choking the feedline will make the wonky SWR measurement settle down. And, yes, adding a longer feedline will probably reduce the SWR weirdness (or at least move it around to different frequencies), but it's not a particularly good solution to the problem... you'd probably have to add a lot of coax (and thus a lot of unwanted losses) in order to reduce the SWR excursions by much. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! Hi Dave Platt I suspect the original Dave has mounted the antenna so the dipoles are parallel with the mast. And it wasnt clear that he'd taken into account the need for some sort of a device to allow a balanced antenna to an unbalanced line. It seemed like a good 'starting question'. By my analysis, the LPDA is a set of dipoles fed from one end so it tends to create a pattern null in the direction toward the dipoles from the feed end. Those dipoles which are too short or too long to be well matched to the line wont radiate enough to upset the null depth. If the feed line and tower are coupled to only one half of the dipoles some unbalance is expected. Jerry |