Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 1, 11:05 am, Wimpie wrote:
On 1 jul, 14:36, Alan Peake wrote: Q. What is the optimum antenna type to give the maximum gain given a fixed overall length of elements? Or, alternately, what's the minimum amount of wire/tubing to give a specified gain? (Neglecting support structures) As an example, for a gain of 15 dBi, an 11 element Yagi appears to have about the same gain as two stacked 6 element Yagis which collectively use one more element. But what about collinears, V Beams, arrays of different sized Yagis etc. etc.? Just out of curiosity. Alan Hello Alan, There is no optimum antenna design that fits everything. Some factors: Center Frequency Side lobe level requirements Gain requirements Available materials Required bandwidth. Design skills / Experience Ease of production Number of antennas to be produced, Available volume Sentimental Environmental aspects Visibility (think of covert antennas). There are (physical) limitations on antenna gain and antenna size. Antennas with high gain must have a size far above wavelength. Reduction of side lobes with given gain also requires a larger antenna. Omni directional gain requires large vertical antenna structures. Every 3 dB gain increase, requires double the (vertical) size. Best regards, Wim PA3DJSwww.tetech.nl don't forget to remove abc when replying directly. May I offer a rebuttal to your use of "size:" with respect to radiators? The addition of radiators and a time varying field to a Gaussian field shows that a radiator can be any size,shape or elevation as long as it is in equilibrium. This is because the result of additions to Gauss's static law results in the same law of Maxwell. It can also be seen that any deviation from a straight line format which creats lumped loading must be neutralized since radiation is related to distributed loads L and C. Thus shape or size is a determination of the neutralisation of lumped loads while attaining equilibrium. With the above in hand it can be seen that Foucault current generates a field that elevates particles that have attained a weak magnetic field by entering the earths system which provides for their rejection or ejection. Per Newtons Law the weak forces involved (Fermi) create an oscillation of the radiator which is a mirror image of arriving impulses upon a radiuator with the same natural resonance. It is only convention that calls for an radiator to be straight of which a helix antenna is an excellent example ,where a continuation of rotation back to the originating point provides for a full circuit in equilibrium si9nce added lumped loads are cancelled. Examples of the foucault current was provided earlier on this forum when describing the separation of scrap metal by Foucault current rejection. As with Newton, Faraday Gauss etc all laws depend on the theme of equilibrium within a boundary of a balanced universe and not on minute sections thereof. Have a great week end Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|