Art Unwin wrote:

With the above in hand it can be seen
that Foucault current generates a field that elevates particles that
have attained a weak magnetic field by entering the earths system
which provides for their rejection or ejection. Per Newtons Law the
weak forces
involved (Fermi) create an oscillation of the radiator which is a
mirror image of arriving impulses upon a radiuator with the same
natural resonance.

Hi Art -

You have a unique way of making simple notions seem utterly
ridiculous. :-)

ac6xg

On Jul 1, 2:58 pm, Jim Kelley wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
With the above in hand it can be seen
that Foucault current generates a field that elevates particles that
have attained a weak magnetic field by entering the earths system
which provides for their rejection or ejection. Per Newtons Law the
weak forces
involved (Fermi) create an oscillation of the radiator which is a
mirror image of arriving impulses upon a radiuator with the same
natural resonance.

Hi Art -

You have a unique way of making simple notions seem utterly
ridiculous. :-)

ac6xg

Jim
You are now doing your job as a teacher and a ham not a physicist.
The first two jobs are about repeating what is in the books parrot
fashion
and to prevent change . A physicist, which you are not, accepts
the
possibility that all is not known and is willing to question or debate
a
subject instead of exercising free speech without substance.
Using what education you have on the subject state in clear terms as
to why
what you are refering to is ridiculous so your posts have some meaning
that
others can follow inteligently
Regards
Art

Art Unwin wrote:
On Jul 1, 2:58 pm, Jim Kelley wrote:

Art Unwin wrote:

With the above in hand it can be seen
that Foucault current generates a field that elevates particles that
have attained a weak magnetic field by entering the earths system
which provides for their rejection or ejection. Per Newtons Law the
weak forces
involved (Fermi) create an oscillation of the radiator which is a
mirror image of arriving impulses upon a radiuator with the same
natural resonance.

Hi Art -

You have a unique way of making simple notions seem utterly
ridiculous. :-)

ac6xg


Jim
You are now doing your job as a teacher and a ham not a physicist.

I don't have a job on the internet, Art. I was just speaking plainly
and honestly.

ac6xg

On Jul 1, 5:35 pm, Jim Kelley wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
On Jul 1, 2:58 pm, Jim Kelley wrote:

Art Unwin wrote:

With the above in hand it can be seen
that Foucault current generates a field that elevates particles that
have attained a weak magnetic field by entering the earths system
which provides for their rejection or ejection. Per Newtons Law the
weak forces
involved (Fermi) create an oscillation of the radiator which is a
mirror image of arriving impulses upon a radiuator with the same
natural resonance.

Hi Art -

You have a unique way of making simple notions seem utterly
ridiculous. :-)

ac6xg

Jim
You are now doing your job as a teacher and a ham not a physicist.

I don't have a job on the internet, Art. I was just speaking plainly
and honestly.

ac6xg

But you supplied no substanc! You did not share what you were talking
about
or a point of contention just a use of free speech as in graphitty If
you had
knowledge of what I was speaking off then you could have delved in and
explain your comments
but you are deficient. I don't have time to teach a parrot another
line
Art

Art Unwin wrote:
On Jul 1, 5:35 pm, Jim Kelley wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
On Jul 1, 2:58 pm, Jim Kelley wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
With the above in hand it can be seen
that Foucault current generates a field that elevates particles that
have attained a weak magnetic field by entering the earths system
which provides for their rejection or ejection. Per Newtons Law the
weak forces
involved (Fermi) create an oscillation of the radiator which is a
mirror image of arriving impulses upon a radiuator with the same
natural resonance.
Hi Art -
You have a unique way of making simple notions seem utterly
ridiculous. :-)
ac6xg
Jim
You are now doing your job as a teacher and a ham not a physicist.
I don't have a job on the internet, Art. I was just speaking plainly
and honestly.

ac6xg

But you supplied no substanc! You did not share what you were talking
about
or a point of contention just a use of free speech as in graphitty If
you had
knowledge of what I was speaking off then you could have delved in and
explain your comments
but you are deficient. I don't have time to teach a parrot another
line
Art

Art, you are sooooo amusing. You are one of the reasons I read this group.

You make statements that haven't a shred of connection with reality, are
not testable, make statements about what you yourself have said or
"published" that aren't accurate, not even a little, and then you have
the unmitigated gaul to tell people they have said nothing.

You are wonderful!

tom
K0TAR

On Jul 1, 8:09 pm, Tom Ring wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
On Jul 1, 5:35 pm, Jim Kelley wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
On Jul 1, 2:58 pm, Jim Kelley wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
With the above in hand it can be seen
that Foucault current generates a field that elevates particles that
have attained a weak magnetic field by entering the earths system
which provides for their rejection or ejection. Per Newtons Law the
weak forces
involved (Fermi) create an oscillation of the radiator which is a
mirror image of arriving impulses upon a radiuator with the same
natural resonance.
Hi Art -
You have a unique way of making simple notions seem utterly
ridiculous. :-)
ac6xg
Jim
You are now doing your job as a teacher and a ham not a physicist.
I don't have a job on the internet, Art. I was just speaking plainly
and honestly.

ac6xg

But you supplied no substanc! You did not share what you were talking
about
or a point of contention just a use of free speech as in graphitty If
you had
knowledge of what I was speaking off then you could have delved in and
explain your comments
but you are deficient. I don't have time to teach a parrot another
line
Art

Art, you are sooooo amusing. You are one of the reasons I read this group.

You make statements that haven't a shred of connection with reality, are
not testable, make statements about what you yourself have said or
"published" that aren't accurate, not even a little, and then you have
the unmitigated gaul to tell people they have said nothing.

You are wonderful!

tom
K0TAR

David I have said many technical things as I see it. Nobody has given
me good reason why it cannot be so
Every day false hoods are given without corroberating facts. Nobody
but nobody has supplied reasonable doubt.
Now many people on this newsgroup make up stories or just lie. David a
little while ago described an antenna that I made of high gain
which was a result of an optimiser. One big lie! I can't model my
antenna since it is made of pre twisted wire.The fact is that I am
beginning to believe that many posters are not educated as they
pretend they are. Computer programs abound but nobody has taken me up
regarding antenna programs that I have made. Is everybody incapable or
just lazy. Another point the denial of the mathematics in the dispute
with respect to Gauss and Maxwell. Why was this a point of contention
when no facts were supplied to deny it. Then we come to eddy
curfrents and a particle rejection field. Levitation is very well
known.Eddy currents are also well known and is the reason for
laminations in transformers,. Why is it that such things are unknown
to educated posters? Every day there is a post that suggest of an old
wives tale but posters accept it without rebuttal. Why? Don,t you care
about the spreading of such things? Why not a rebuttal from anybody.
Why did your post stick a finger in my eye with out needed substance
that pushed you to post?
Fact is that some suggest that they have an educqation without stating
that it is 50 years old and they have forgotten most.
This is why many threads exceed 1000 posts. The posts have no
substance in relation to the discussion at hand or attempts to change
the subject. If I remember correctly Tom you were one of those who
could not accept the mathematics supplied by Davis but without
offering to identify errors of mathematics and still haven't.
Thank goodness for free speech so one can quickly see who they are and
what they are.
Art

Free speech.
Yes Art, you have the right to say almost anything you want. You do
not have the 'right' to think people are going to believe/listen to
you, especially after some of your previous 'speeches'. (Lump me in
that 'Al Cap' category. Do we get registration numbers?)
Before I'm reminded not to encourage 'trolls', I'll quit.
- 'Doc

Tom Ring wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
On Jul 1, 5:35 pm, Jim Kelley wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
On Jul 1, 2:58 pm, Jim Kelley wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
With the above in hand it can be seen
that Foucault current generates a field that elevates particles that
have attained a weak magnetic field by entering the earths system
which provides for their rejection or ejection. Per Newtons Law the
weak forces
involved (Fermi) create an oscillation of the radiator which is a
mirror image of arriving impulses upon a radiuator with the same
natural resonance.
Hi Art -
You have a unique way of making simple notions seem utterly
ridiculous. :-)
ac6xg
Jim
You are now doing your job as a teacher and a ham not a physicist.
I don't have a job on the internet, Art. I was just speaking plainly
and honestly.

ac6xg

But you supplied no substanc! You did not share what you were talking
about
or a point of contention just a use of free speech as in graphitty If
you had
knowledge of what I was speaking off then you could have delved in and
explain your comments
but you are deficient. I don't have time to teach a parrot another
line
Art

Art, you are sooooo amusing. You are one of the reasons I read this group.

You make statements that haven't a shred of connection with reality, are
not testable, make statements about what you yourself have said or
"published" that aren't accurate, not even a little, and then you have
the unmitigated gaul to tell people they have said nothing.

You are wonderful!

tom
K0TAR

I like the term "unmitigated gaul." It reminds me, somehow, of the
present leader of France.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH