Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed wrote in
. 192.196: .... Apparently well enough to cause a problem. Its now 9 days later from the above comment, and I see today that the original poster followed my suggestion to install a balun which has solved his problem. Ed, that defines how you define the problem. If the problem was different measurements, that was caused by disturbing the thing that was measured. The different measurements hints another possible problem, common mode feedline current. The baluns have changed the effect of those, and probably differently at different frequencies. But fundamentally, it is wiser to preserve the common mode current path (even if you reckon the baluns help to reduce it) when making the measurments. The whole exercise demonstrates that the measurements from shack were valid, it was disconnecting the feedline and making measurements at the feedpoint that was invalid. (BTW, the measurements in the shack should be done with the shield path connected as normal.) A good example of the limited thinking in the proposition that you can only make valid measurements at the feedpoint. Owen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Yagi in Proximity of Vertical/SNR problem..answers??? | Antenna | |||
Vertical antenna problem | Antenna | |||
Odd problem with 6/2/70 triband vertical | Antenna | |||
Dual Band vertical (2m/70 cm) problem / details | Antenna | |||
Hustler 6btv Vertical Tech Problem | Antenna |