![]() |
|
Telescopic aluminum question
On 04 Aug 2008 00:11:56 GMT, Ed
wrote: My thanks to those who have responded so far. Much food for thought. Roy, I downloaded the demo program.... BUT.... I'm going to have to spend some time learning its operation... it appears to have a considerable learning curve, which I'm sure will be well worth the time.... when I get it. Commets on salt water corrosion have been noted. I'm about 1/4 mile from the nearest salt water.... and down wind. My mobile RV vertical antenna has been parked here for about 3 months now and is already showing early signs of the corrosion. My thoughts at the moment are I can either easily remove the aluminum elements and clean them every 6 months or so, OR perhaps I should use an insulated wire supported by a fibre glass support. I note someone mentioned the DX-IS poles out of Georgia. Although I swore I would stick to only the vertical I originally spoke of, the idea of a quality fibreglass mast does seem to have benefits for my location. If anyone else can recommend other sources, or their opinions of robust fibreglass masts, I'm receptive. Given the comments on projected poorer performance of a 30 foot vertical, I suppose I need consider one that is higher, but I have CC&R's, and while not enforced, I do not wish to draw attention to myself. Thanks to all, so far. Ed K7AAT My EZNEC models don't show much difference in radiator materials with a diameter of of 1.5 inches. Why not steel TV masting? It has been mentioned that 70 feet would be better but so would 140 feet! We all have some sort of limitations. The important thing is to get a workable antenna up. If a thirty foot radiator is what you can do that is it. Life is simpler with a good antenna tuner (I love my SGC-237) and I am on the air. I expect it would work well with a thirty foot wire as well. The more important consideration is the ground issue. I bought 2000 feet of insulated wire on EBAY and it worked out to about 35 radials of up to 70 feet. They are stapled into the grass and hard to locate after a couple of years even though they are bright green. I rarely use the vertical for anything other than 40-80 & 160 but it will load up to 10 meters for sure and probably the advertised 6 meters for the tuner. You might find my primitive experiment interesting..... http://dixienc.us/28FtVert/28FtVertical.htm John Ferrell W8CCW |
Telescopic aluminum question
Ed wrote:
I am considering putting up a ground mounted vertical antenna, based on using telescopic aluminum tubing such as is available from Texas Towers or DX Engineering. Tubing available ranges from .500 inch to 2.125" with corresponding increase in price as diameters increase. My vertical should be limited to a maximum of 30 feet, but preferrably around 23 - 25 feet. I will feed it with an SGC coupler at the base and operate 80M - 10M. My question: Using the 6' long aluminum pieces, what is the minimum diameter sizes I should start with to enable the antenna stand up to a 75mph wind UN-GUYED. Also, how much "overlap" should I use in the telescoping pieces? How much flex do you want to allow? You can make it pretty small, if you don't mind it bending a LOT in the wind. Are you constrained to aluminum? i.e. what about a 15-20 foot length of chainlink fence top rail ( aka galvanized pipe) with a standard mobile whip on top. If you're worried about conductivity, run some copper wire or a stripe of copper tape up the side. |
Telescopic aluminum question
Ed wrote:
I am considering putting up a ground mounted vertical antenna, based on using telescopic aluminum tubing such as is available from Texas Towers or DX Engineering. Tubing available ranges from .500 inch to 2.125" with corresponding increase in price as diameters increase. My vertical should be limited to a maximum of 30 feet, but preferrably around 23 - 25 feet. I will feed it with an SGC coupler at the base and operate 80M - 10M. My question: Using the 6' long aluminum pieces, what is the minimum diameter sizes I should start with to enable the antenna stand up to a 75mph wind UN-GUYED. Also, how much "overlap" should I use in the telescoping pieces? I will consider alternative means of building the vertical, but I really wish it to be unguyed . Any info or recommendations appreciated. TNX Ed K7AAT I use aluminum, a lot ... Silicone, oils/grease has assisted me quite a bit ... as you already know the weight to mass ratio makes ones favorable to this route of antenna construction (aluminum) ... In my meanderings about scape yards, I find titanium is becoming MUCH more available ... it is well worth the few available dollars ... and, of course, depending on availability, this is much more more desirable ... It is possible to construct a MUCH more efficient antenna than can be purchased -- in theses cases, you are simply NOT constrained by the "costs of manufacturing." Regards, JS |
Telescopic aluminum question
Ed wrote in
. 192.196: .... robust fibreglass masts, I'm receptive. Given the comments on projected poorer performance of a 30 foot vertical, I suppose I need consider one that is higher, but I have CC&R's, and while not enforced, I do not wish to draw attention to myself. Or one that is shorter and abandon 80m. A message you should take away is that a 6.5m unloaded vertical (~21') is about as short as will give good efficiency on 40m... given an adequate ground system and tuner at the feed point. Owen |
Telescopic aluminum question
John Ferrell wrote in
: .... It has been mentioned that 70 feet would be better but so would 140 feet! We all have some sort of limitations. Ah, the bigger is better myth! Owen |
Telescopic aluminum question
Owen Duffy wrote:
... Ah, the bigger is better myth! Owen I won't even tell you the length of mine, but 70 feet! That hurts -- LOL! Regards, JS |
Telescopic aluminum question
A belated response to my initial post. After reading all the responses, and after much thought, I have decided to fore-go using a vertical at present. I have problems with high winds, corrosion, some noise, ability to place an adequate grounds system, and even aesthetics, etc. so I have decided, for the time being, anyway, to put up a rather low dipole (NVIS) instead. My thanks to all who took their time to give me their opinions and ideas. Its a good learning experiece, even if I don't proceed with the initial plan. Ed |
Telescopic aluminum question
On 19 Aug 2008 04:59:29 GMT, Ed
wrote: A belated response to my initial post. After reading all the responses, and after much thought, I have decided to fore-go using a vertical at present. I have problems with high winds, corrosion, some noise, ability to place an adequate grounds system, and even aesthetics, etc. so I have decided, for the time being, anyway, to put up a rather low dipole (NVIS) instead. My thanks to all who took their time to give me their opinions and ideas. Its a good learning experiece, even if I don't proceed with the initial plan. Ed It has been an interesting thread. For some reason it never occurred to me that the tubing sold for chain link fence top rails would make an inexpensive and durable vertical. TV masting sems to be getting more expensive and harder to find. I will likely use it for the next refresh cycle on my vertical. Of your stated objections only the matter of the ground seems to be really tough to solve for me. I bet that in time you will try both. The NVIS and vertical will give you two different sets of contacts! John Ferrell W8CCW |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:36 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com