![]() |
The Strange True Story of a Radio Station's Transmitter in NewYork State
Walt Davidson wrote:
On Sat, 9 Aug 2008 14:35:25 +0100, "Alec" wrote: Back at about the same time the BBC had (and still has) a powerful transmitter on 200khz (now198) a local farmer who lived close to the station built a large tuning coil in the loft and lit his house using fluorescent tubes. He was successfully prosecuted for stealing electricity or something similar. If this is true (and I have no reason to doubt it), did it make the signal weaker for everybody else? Unlikely anywhere other than in the very near vicinity, and at that range who would have noticed. -- Brian |
The Strange True Story of a Radio Station's Transmitter in New York State
"Back at about the same time the BBC had (and still has) a powerful transmitter on 200khz (now198) a local farmer who lived close to the station built a large tuning coil in the loft and lit his house using fluorescent tubes. He was successfully prosecuted for stealing electricity or something similar. If this is true (and I have no reason to doubt it), did it make the signal weaker for everybody else? 73 de G3NYY In the version that I heard it was the null that the 'suck out' caused that led to an investigation that resulted in the prosecution. Now whether this is true or not is another matter. 73 Jeff |
The Strange True Story of a Radio Station's Transmitter in NewYork State
Jeff wrote:
"Back at about the same time the BBC had (and still has) a powerful transmitter on 200khz (now198) a local farmer who lived close to the station built a large tuning coil in the loft and lit his house using fluorescent tubes. He was successfully prosecuted for stealing electricity or something similar. If this is true (and I have no reason to doubt it), did it make the signal weaker for everybody else? 73 de G3NYY In the version that I heard it was the null that the 'suck out' caused that led to an investigation that resulted in the prosecution. Now whether this is true or not is another matter. It seems to me that a resonant structure to capture energy would re-radiate so I can't see where such a null would come from, the wavelength is long so the path difference between the main tx and the re-radiator would make such a phase shift difficult to achieve. -- Brian |
The Strange True Story of a Radio Station's Transmitter in New York State
In the version that I heard it was the null that the 'suck out' caused that led to an investigation that resulted in the prosecution. Now whether this is true or not is another matter. It seems to me that a resonant structure to capture energy would re-radiate so I can't see where such a null would come from, the wavelength is long so the path difference between the main tx and the re-radiator would make such a phase shift difficult to achieve. -- Brian Surely that would only be true if the power was not dumped into a load? The power in the load has to come from somewhere, and if it is in the load it is not in the aether. Jeff |
The Strange True Story of a Radio Station's Transmitter in NewYork State
Jeff wrote:
In the version that I heard it was the null that the 'suck out' caused that led to an investigation that resulted in the prosecution. Now whether this is true or not is another matter. It seems to me that a resonant structure to capture energy would re-radiate so I can't see where such a null would come from, the wavelength is long so the path difference between the main tx and the re-radiator would make such a phase shift difficult to achieve. Surely that would only be true if the power was not dumped into a load? The power in the load has to come from somewhere, and if it is in the load it is not in the aether. It depends on the power captured vs the power in the load, but in any case the aperture of the loop is fairly small and cannot allow energy to be captured from outside that aperture. In comparison with the size of the transmitting antenna and the field it generates this must be insignificant I think. In fact, I wonder if he could really run a house full of fluorescent lights this way. -- Brian |
The Strange True Story of a Radio Station's Transmitter in New York State
In article ,
"Jeff" wrote: "Back at about the same time the BBC had (and still has) a powerful transmitter on 200khz (now198) a local farmer who lived close to the station built a large tuning coil in the loft and lit his house using fluorescent tubes. He was successfully prosecuted for stealing electricity or something similar. If this is true (and I have no reason to doubt it), did it make the signal weaker for everybody else? 73 de G3NYY In the version that I heard it was the null that the 'suck out' caused that led to an investigation that resulted in the prosecution. Now whether this is true or not is another matter. 73 Jeff I thought the farmers equipment caused four "nulls", or local minima, in the radiation pattern. -- Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/ |
The Strange True Story of a Radio Station's Transmitter in NewYork State
Alec wrote:
Back at about the same time the BBC had (and still has) a powerful transmitter on 200khz (now198) a local farmer who lived close to the station built a large tuning coil in the loft and lit his house using fluorescent tubes. He was successfully prosecuted for stealing electricity or something similar. Please provide citations for this story; it retells what appears to be an "urban legend". Here is another take on the story: =============QUOTED MATERIAL========================================= From: "Steve Maudsley" Message-ID: Newsgroups: uk.legal Subject: Theft of electricity? Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:12:00 -0000 NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.103.216.21 NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:14:40 GMT Organization: Virgin Net Usenet Service "Jeff" wrote in message ... But a transformer still involves a direct physical connection to the mains via the primary. The primary is consuming current via its physical connection, whatever may happen to the current after it has entered the primary. The power line *is the primary*!! It is just that the secondary is separated from it by a larger distance than normal. In any case I believe that someone was prosecuted some years ago for doing what it being suggested. I do recall a story about 30 years ago (possibly apocryphal) about a farmer who lived on the UK side of the Radio Luxemburg transmitter and powered his cattle shed from the radio waves, and was prosecuted. Radio Luxemburg had some sort of phased array and the cows electrical use disrupted the beam. ================END OF QUOTED MATERIAL==================================== Michael |
The Strange True Story of a Radio Station's Transmitter in NewYork State
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 10:59:56 -0500, msg wrote:
Alec wrote: Back at about the same time the BBC had (and still has) a powerful transmitter on 200khz (now198) a local farmer who lived close to the station built a large tuning coil in the loft and lit his house using fluorescent tubes. He was successfully prosecuted for stealing electricity or something similar. Please provide citations for this story; it retells what appears to be an "urban legend". Here is another take on the story: =============QUOTED MATERIAL========================================= From: "Steve Maudsley" Message-ID: Newsgroups: uk.legal Subject: Theft of electricity? Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:12:00 -0000 NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.103.216.21 NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:14:40 GMT Organization: Virgin Net Usenet Service "Jeff" wrote in message ... But a transformer still involves a direct physical connection to the mains via the primary. The primary is consuming current via its physical connection, whatever may happen to the current after it has entered the primary. The power line *is the primary*!! It is just that the secondary is separated from it by a larger distance than normal. In any case I believe that someone was prosecuted some years ago for doing what it being suggested. I do recall a story about 30 years ago (possibly apocryphal) about a farmer who lived on the UK side of the Radio Luxemburg transmitter and powered his cattle shed from the radio waves, and was prosecuted. Radio Luxemburg had some sort of phased array and the cows electrical use disrupted the beam. ================END OF QUOTED MATERIAL==================================== Michael Didn't Tesla propose using DC current, basically broadcast/produced from thousands of transmitters. In order to use the electrical current/field, all one had to do was ground one side/wire to Earth. The other side or wire would be the receptor/antenna for lack of a better term. I'm not a technical person but I think I have the basic premise right. |
The Strange True Story of a Radio Station's Transmitter in NewYorkState
christopher wrote: Didn't Tesla propose using DC current, basically broadcast/produced from thousands of transmitters. In order to use the electrical current/field, all one had to do was ground one side/wire to Earth. The other side or wire would be the receptor/antenna for lack of a better term. I'm not a technical person but I think I have the basic premise right. No. It wasn't DC, since DC is direct current. That was Edison who would have needed a power plant every half mile or so. Tesla was hyping "Broadcast power" which was lossy broadband RF power that would wipe out most of the usable RF spectrum. Due to the 'Inverse Square Law', it was impractical, and always will be. Tesla was responsible for AC power distribution, which ****ed Edison off. -- http://improve-usenet.org/index.html aioe.org, Goggle Groups, and Web TV users must request to be white listed, or I will not see your messages. If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm There are two kinds of people on this earth: The crazy, and the insane. The first sign of insanity is denying that you're crazy. |
The Strange True Story of a Radio Station's Transmitter in NewYork State
christopher wrote:
snip Didn't Tesla propose using DC current, basically broadcast/produced from thousands of transmitters. In order to use the electrical current/field, all one had to do was ground one side/wire to Earth. The other side or wire would be the receptor/antenna for lack of a better term. FWIW, the Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_energy_transfer describes some of Tesla's ideas and also has a list of references to more recent wireless energy distribution schemes. Michael |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com