Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JB wrote:
Well, I can't explain anything rationaly to you because you are jumping wildly to conclusions like a cartoon character. All I'm saying, is that you need to objectively assess risks. If you can't do that you ought to be institutionalized for the safety of yourself and others. The statistics of wireless devices causing harm are so off the radar there are none! And this is the smoking gun - if there were, they would have come forward by now from the 2 way and uwave industry with complaints, but I haven't heard of anyone in the business who HAS been harmed in my 30 years of experience. And that is 15 years under the old standards of RF exposure - NONE. I invite anyone from the industry who reasonably thinks they have been harmed to respond. Particularly from the retired folks. I'm not talking about RF burns, as they are minor and pain has a way of causing you to limit that exposure. You can eliminate the potential of risk entirely by throwing away all RF devices. But don't stop there because of all the risks that you failed to account for, such as rolling out of bed in the morning or burning yourself making breakfast or tripping on the front steps or getting in a wreck on the way to work. THAT is a major risk statistically, whereas the statistics of RF harm are unknown because no is so stupid, to cut their arm off or cut a hole in the uwave oven door AS YOU SUGGESTED just to get a chance to GET harmful exposure, which sort of proves my point about the general public having to try real hard in order to to be exposed to harmfull levels of energy. Getting back to the cell phones and Blackberry's - and I thought that's what we were talking about - DON'T WORRY ABOUT IT! They really don't amount to squat! Honest! BTW I put a mouse in a Litton uwave oven in 1983 for 10 seconds and removed him because I didn't want to push the little guys luck or see him suffer. NO noticeable or discernable damage or harm was done and he went on to sire several healthy normal litters. Just to clarify, you seem to imply, a 1.2288KW, equivalent, source of freqs in the "cooking bands" and at a distance of 384mm/38.4cm/~15-inches from your head is "nothing to sweat." (and given, the sources antenna is omni-directional) Surely you can see how some men would withhold agreement ... at least until a time in the future ... Regards, JS |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|